The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-class protein fold recognition using support vector machines and neural networks
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Protein fold recognition is an important approach to structure discovery without relying on sequence similarity. We study this approach with new multi-class classification methods and examined many issues important for a practical recognition system. Results: Most current discriminative methods for protein fold prediction use the one-against-others method, which has the well-known ‘False Positives’ problem. We investigated two new methods: the unique one-against-others and the all-against-all methods. Both improve prediction accuracy by 14–110% on a dataset containing 27 SCOP folds. We used the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and the Neural Network (NN) learning methods as base classifiers. SVMs converges fast and leads to high accuracy. When scores of multiple parameter datasets are combined, majority voting reduces noise and increases recognition accuracy. We examined many issues involved with large number of classes, including dependencies of prediction accuracy on the number of folds and on the number of representatives in a fold. Overall, recognition systems achieve 56% fold prediction accuracy on a protein test dataset, where most of the proteins have below 25% sequence identity with the proteins used in training. Supplementary information: The protein parameter datasets used in this paper are available online (http://www.nersc.gov/~cding/protein). Contact: chqding@lbl.gov; ildubchak@lbl.gov * To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Cited by
MINIMUM REDUNDANCY FEATURE SELECTION FROM MICROARRAY GENE EXPRESSION DATA
DING, C., & PENG, H. (2005) · Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology · doi:10.1142/s0219720005001004 · Cited by 2,751
Self-citationComparing two K-category assignments by a K-category correlation coefficient
Gorodkin, J. (2004) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2004.09.006 · Cited by 545
Chou, K.-C., & Cai, Y.-D. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m204161200 · Cited by 483
Rao, H. B., Zhu, F., Yang, G. B., Li, Z. R., & Chen, Y. Z. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr284 · Cited by 359
Support vector machines for predicting membrane protein types by using functional domain composition
Cai, Y.-D., Zhou, G.-P., & Chou, K.-C. (2003) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(03)70050-2 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, C. H. Q., & Dubchak, I.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-04-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 349-358
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2109109045
- Cited by
- 834
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-class protein fold recognition using support vector machines and neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.4.349
- The paper
- Ding, C. H. Q., & Dubchak, I. (2001). Multi-class protein fold recognition using support vector machines and neural networks. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.4.349
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.