The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MINIMUM REDUNDANCY FEATURE SELECTION FROM MICROARRAY GENE EXPRESSION DATA
Abstract
How to selecting a small subset out of the thousands of genes in microarray data is important for accurate classification of phenotypes. Widely used methods typically rank genes according to their differential expressions among phenotypes and pick the top-ranked genes. We observe that feature sets so obtained have certain redundancy and study methods to minimize it. We propose a minimum redundancy — maximum relevance (MRMR) feature selection framework. Genes selected via MRMR provide a more balanced coverage of the space and capture broader characteristics of phenotypes. They lead to significantly improved class predictions in extensive experiments on 6 gene expression data sets: NCI, Lymphoma, Lung, Child Leukemia, Leukemia, and Colon. Improvements are observed consistently among 4 classification methods: Naïve Bayes, Linear discriminant analysis, Logistic regression, and Support vector machines. Supplimentary: The top 60 MRMR genes for each of the datasets are listed in . More information related to MRMR methods can be found at .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Cited by
A survey on feature selection methods
Chandrashekar, G., & Sahin, F. (2014) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.11.024 · Cited by 5,189
Alterations of the human gut microbiome in liver cirrhosis
Qin, N., Yang, F., Li, A., Prifti, E., Chen, Y., Shao, L., Guo, J., Le Chatelier, E., Yao, J., Wu, L., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13568 · Cited by 2,177
Predicting cancer outcomes with radiomics and artificial intelligence in radiology
Bera, K., Braman, N., Gupta, A., Velcheti, V., & Madabhushi, A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-021-00560-7 · Cited by 819
Data-analysis strategies for image-based cell profiling
Caicedo, J. C., Cooper, S., Heigwer, F., Warchal, S., Qiu, P., Molnar, C., Vasilevich, A. S., Barry, J. D., Bansal, H. S., Kraus, O., et al. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4397 · Cited by 739
Multimodal deep learning models for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease stage
Venugopalan, J., Tong, L., Hassanzadeh, H. R., & Wang, M. D. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74399-w · Cited by 732
Metadata
- Authors
- DING, C., & PENG, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 03
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 185-205
- ISSN
- 0219-7200 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-6334
- OpenAlex
- W2131987814
- Cited by
- 2,751
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MINIMUM REDUNDANCY FEATURE SELECTION FROM MICROARRAY GENE EXPRESSION DATA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/s0219720005001004
- The paper
- DING, C., & PENG, H. (2005). MINIMUM REDUNDANCY FEATURE SELECTION FROM MICROARRAY GENE EXPRESSION DATA. Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219720005001004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.