The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AL2CO: calculation of positional conservation in a protein sequence alignment
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Amino acid sequence alignments are widely used in the analysis of protein structure, function and evolutionary relationships. Proteins within a superfamily usually share the same fold and possess related functions. These structural and functional constraints are reflected in the alignment conservation patterns. Positions of functional and/or structural importance tend to be more conserved. Conserved positions are usually clustered in distinct motifs surrounded by sequence segments of low conservation. Poorly conserved regions might also arise from the imperfections in multiple alignment algorithms and thus indicate possible alignment errors. Quantification of conservation by attributing a conservation index to each aligned position makes motif detection more convenient. Mapping these conservation indices onto a protein spatial structure helps to visualize spatial conservation features of the molecule and to predict functionally and/or structurally important sites. Analysis of conservation indices could be a useful tool in detection of potentially misaligned regions and will aid in improvement of multiple alignments. Results: We developed a program to calculate a conservation index at each position in a multiple sequence alignment using several methods. Namely, amino acid frequencies at each position are estimated and the conservation index is calculated from these frequencies. We utilize both unweighted frequencies and frequencies weighted using two different strategies. Three conceptually different approaches (entropy-based, variance-based and matrix score-based) are implemented in the algorithm to define the conservation index. Calculating conservation indices for 35522 positions in 284 alignments from SMART database we demonstrate that different methods result in highly correlated (correlation coefficient more than 0.85) conservation indices. Conservation indices show statistically significant correlation between sequentially adjacent positions \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(i\) \end{document}and \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(i\ +\ j\) \end{document}, where \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(j\ {<}\ 13\) \end{document}, and averaging of the indices over the window of three positions is optimal for motif detection. Positions with gaps display substantially lower conservation properties. We compare conservation properties of the SMART alignments or FSSP structural alignments to those of the ClustalW alignments. The results suggest that conservation indices should be a valuable tool of alignment quality assessment and might be used as an objective function for refinement of multiple alignments. Availability: The C code of the AL2CO program and its pre-compiled versions for several platforms as well as the details of the analysis are freely available at ftp://iole.swmed.edu/pub/al2co/. Contact: grishin@chop.swmed.edu * To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DIALIGN 2: improvement of the segment-to-segment approach to multiple sequence alignment.
Morgenstern, B. (1999) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/15.3.211 · Cited by 678
Cited by
Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a 3-track network
Baek, M., DiMaio, F., Anishchenko, I., Dauparas, J., Ovchinnikov, S., Lee, G. R., Wang, J., Cong, Q., Kinch, L. N., Schaeffer, R. D., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.06.14.448402 · Cited by 5,549
Self-citationPhosphorylation of innate immune adaptor proteins MAVS, STING, and TRIF induces IRF3 activation
Liu, S., Cai, X., Wu, J., Cong, Q., Chen, X., Li, T., Du, F., Ren, J., Wu, Y.-T., Grishin, N. V., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa2630 · Cited by 1,927
Self-citationArgout, X., Salse, J., Aury, J.-M., Guiltinan, M. J., Droc, G., Gouzy, J., Allegre, M., Chaparro, C., Legavre, T., Maximova, S. N., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.736 · Cited by 746
Tools for integrated sequence-structure analysis with UCSF Chimera
Meng, E. C., Pettersen, E. F., Couch, G. S., Huang, C. C., & Ferrin, T. E. (2006) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-339 · Cited by 732
Nishida, Y., Rardin, M. J., Carrico, C., He, W., Sahu, A. K., Gut, P., Najjar, R., Fitch, M., Hellerstein, M., Gibson, B. W., et al. (2015) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.022 · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Authors
- Pei, J., & Grishin, N. V.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-08-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 700-712
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2060791849
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AL2CO: calculation of positional conservation in a protein sequence alignment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.700
- The paper
- Pei, J., & Grishin, N. V. (2001). AL2CO: calculation of positional conservation in a protein sequence alignment. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.700
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.