The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Principal component analysis for clustering gene expression data
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: There is a great need to develop analytical methodology to analyze and to exploit the information contained in gene expression data. Because of the large number of genes and the complexity of biological networks, clustering is a useful exploratory technique for analysis of gene expression data. Other classical techniques, such as principal component analysis (PCA), have also been applied to analyze gene expression data. Using different data analysis techniques and different clustering algorithms to analyze the same data set can lead to very different conclusions. Our goal is to study the effectiveness of principal components (PCs) in capturing cluster structure. Specifically, using both real and synthetic gene expression data sets, we compared the quality of clusters obtained from the original data to the quality of clusters obtained after projecting onto subsets of the principal component axes. Results: Our empirical study showed that clustering with the PCs instead of the original variables does not necessarily improve, and often degrades, cluster quality. In particular, the first few PCs (which contain most of the variation in the data) do not necessarily capture most of the cluster structure. We also showed that clustering with PCs has different impact on different algorithms and different similarity metrics. Overall, we would not recommend PCA before clustering except in special circumstances. Contact: kayee@cs.washington.edu Supplementary information: http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/kayee/pca * To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
Cited by
Factor analysis applied to regional geochemical data: problems and possibilities
Reimann, C., Filzmoser, P., & Garrett, R. G. (2002) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0883-2927(01)00066-x · Cited by 771
Community detection in networks: A multidisciplinary review
Javed, M. A., Younis, M. S., Latif, S., Qadir, J., & Baig, A. (2018) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2018.02.011 · Cited by 499
Xia, Q., Cheng, D., Duan, J., Wang, G., Cheng, T., Zha, X., Liu, C., Zhao, P., Dai, F., Zhang, Z., et al. (2007) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-8-r162 · Cited by 323
Li, H.-L., Pang, Y.-H., & Liu, B. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab829 · Cited by 269
Reconstruction of the Mouse Otocyst and Early Neuroblast Lineage at Single-Cell Resolution
Durruthy-Durruthy, R., Gottlieb, A., Hartman, B. H., Waldhaus, J., Laske, R. D., Altman, R., & Heller, S. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.036 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Yeung, K. Y., & Ruzzo, W. L.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-09-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 763-774
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2125310307
- Cited by
- 1,268
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principal component analysis for clustering gene expression data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.9.763
- The paper
- Yeung, K. Y., & Ruzzo, W. L. (2001). Principal component analysis for clustering gene expression data. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.9.763
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.