The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Partial least squares proportional hazard regression for application to DNA microarray survival data
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Microarrays are increasingly used in cancer research. When gene transcription data from microarray experiments also contains patient survival information, it is often of interest to predict the survival times based on the gene expression. In this paper we consider the well-known proportional hazard (PH) regression model for survival analysis. Ordinarily, the PH model is used with a few covariates and many observations (subjects). We consider here the case that the number of covariates, p, exceeds the number of samples, N, a setting typical of gene expression data from DNA microarrays. Results: For a given vector of response values which are survival times and p gene expressions (covariates) we examine the problem of how to predict the survival probabilities, when N ≪ p. The approach taken to cope with the high dimensionality is to reduce the dimension using partial least squares with the response variable as the vector of survival times. After dimension reduction, the extracted PLS gene components are then used as covariates in a PH regression to predict the survival probabilities. We demonstrate the use of the methodology on two cDNA gene expression data sets, both containing survival data. The first data set contains 40 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) tissue samples and the second data set contains 49 tissue samples from patients with locally advanced breast cancer in a prospective study. Availability: The methodology can be implemented using a combination of standard statistical methods, available, for example, in SAS. Sample SAS macro codes to implement the methods will be available at http://stat.tamu.edu/~dnguyen/supplemental.html Contact: dnguyen@stat.tamu.edudmrocke@ucdavis.edu * To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals
GRAMBSCH, P. M., & THERNEAU, T. M. (1994) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.515 · Cited by 5,885
Cited by
Partial least squares: a versatile tool for the analysis of high-dimensional genomic data
Boulesteix, A.-L., & Strimmer, K. (2006) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbl016 · Cited by 802
Outcome signature genes in breast cancer: is there a unique set?
Ein-Dor, L., Kela, I., Getz, G., Givol, D., & Domany, E. (2005) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth469 · Cited by 802
Data-driven modelling of signal-transduction networks
Janes, K. A., & Yaffe, M. B. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2041 · Cited by 356
PLS generalised linear regression
Bastien, P., Vinzi, V. E., & Tenenhaus, M. (2005) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.02.005 · Cited by 281
Mok, S. C., Bonome, T., Vathipadiekal, V., Bell, A., Johnson, M. E., Wong, K.-K., Park, D.-C., Hao, K., Yip, D. K. P., Donninger, H., et al. (2009) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.10.018 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Nguyen, D. V., & Rocke, D. M.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1625-1632
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2123672572
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Partial least squares proportional hazard regression for application to DNA microarray survival data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.12.1625
- The paper
- Nguyen, D. V., & Rocke, D. M. (2002). Partial least squares proportional hazard regression for application to DNA microarray survival data. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.12.1625
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.