The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inference of a genetic network by a combined approach of cluster analysis and graphical Gaussian modeling
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Recent advances in DNA microarray technologies have made it possible to measure the expression levels of thousands of genes simultaneously under different conditions. The data obtained by microarray analyses are called expression profile data. One type of important information underlying the expression profile data is the ‘genetic network,’ that is, the regulatory network among genes. Graphical Gaussian Modeling (GGM) is a widely utilized method to infer or test relationships among a plural of variables. Results: In this study, we developed a method combining the cluster analysis with GGM for the inference of the genetic network from the expression profile data. The expression profile data of 2467 Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes measured under 79 different conditions (Eisen et al. , Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA , 95, 14683–14868, 1998) were used for this study. At first, the 2467 genes were classified into 34 clusters by a cluster analysis, as a preprocessing for GGM. Then, the expression levels of the genes in each cluster were averaged for each condition. The averaged expression profile data of 34 clusters were subjected to GGM, and a partial correlation coefficient matrix was obtained as a model of the genetic network of S. cerevisiae. The accuracy of the inferred network was examined by the agreement of our results with the cumulative results of experimental studies. Availability: A set of programs will be electronically sent upon request. Contact: toh@beri.co.jp; horimoto@ged.saga-med.ac.jp * To whom correspondence should be addressed. † Both authors contributed equally to this work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation
Efron, B., & Gong, G. (1983) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1983.10483087 · Cited by 3,229
Comparative Genomics of the Eukaryotes
Rubin, G. M., Yandell, M. D., Wortman, J. R., Gabor, G. L., Miklos, Nelson, C. R., Hariharan, I. K., Fortini, M. E., Li, P. W., Apweiler, R., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5461.2204 · Cited by 1,698 · cited 2×
“SUC2 is a gene for the sucrose hydrolyzing enzyme called invertase, which is included in cluster 23. SNF1–3 are considered to constitute a large complex together with SWI1 and SWI3, to form a supermolecule involved in the expression regulation of various genes, including SUC2 ( Peterson and Herskowitz, 1992 ).”
Background
Cited by
Inferring Cellular Networks Using Probabilistic Graphical Models
Friedman, N. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1094068 · Cited by 1,202
Discovery of meaningful associations in genomic data using partial correlation coefficients
de la Fuente, A., Bing, N., Hoeschele, I., & Mendes, P. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth445 · Cited by 553
Dietz, K.-J., Vogel, M. O., & Viehhauser, A. (2010) · Protoplasma · doi:10.1007/s00709-010-0142-8 · Cited by 381
Lezon, T. R., Banavar, J. R., Cieplak, M., Maritan, A., & Fedoroff, N. V. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0609152103 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Toh, H., & Horimoto, K.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-02-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 287-297
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2145590522
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inference of a genetic network by a combined approach of cluster analysis and graphical Gaussian modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.2.287
- The paper
- Toh, H., & Horimoto, K. (2002). Inference of a genetic network by a combined approach of cluster analysis and graphical Gaussian modeling. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.2.287
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.