The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A mixture model-based approach to the clustering of microarray expression data
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: This paper introduces the software EMMIX-GENE that has been developed for the specific purpose of a model-based approach to the clustering of microarray expression data, in particular, of tissue samples on a very large number of genes. The latter is a nonstandard problem in parametric cluster analysis because the dimension of the feature space (the number of genes) is typically much greater than the number of tissues. A feasible approach is provided by first selecting a subset of the genes relevant for the clustering of the tissue samples by fitting mixtures of tdistributions to rank the genes in order of increasing size of the likelihood ratio statistic for the test of one versus two components in the mixture model. The imposition of a threshold on the likelihood ratio statistic used in conjunction with a threshold on the size of a cluster allows the selection of a relevant set of genes. However, even this reduced set of genes will usually be too large for a normal mixture model to be fitted directly to the tissues, and so the use of mixtures of factor analyzers is exploited to reduce effectively the dimension of the feature space of genes. Results: The usefulness of the EMMIX-GENE approach for the clustering of tissue samples is demonstrated on two well-known data sets on colon and leukaemia tissues. For both data sets, relevant subsets of the genes are able to be selected that reveal interesting clusterings of the tissues that are either consistent with the external classification of the tissues or with background and biological knowledge of these sets. Availability: EMMIX-GENE is available at http://www.maths.uq.edu.au/~gjm/emmix-gene/ Contact: gjm@maths.uq.edu.au
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
Golub, T. R., Slonim, D. K., Tamayo, P., Huard, C., Gaasenbeek, M., Mesirov, J. P., Coller, H., Loh, M. L., Downing, J. R., Caligiuri, M. A., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.531 · Cited by 11,516
McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471721182 · Cited by 10,991
Self-citationThe EM Algorithm and Extensions
Kushary, D. (1998) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1998.10485534 · Cited by 5,417
Alon, U., Barkai, N., Notterman, D. A., Gish, K., Ybarra, S., Mack, D., & Levine, A. J. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.12.6745 · Cited by 4,167
Comparison of Discrimination Methods for the Classification of Tumors Using Gene Expression Data
Dudoit, S., Fridlyand, J., & Speed, T. P. (2002) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214502753479248 · Cited by 2,672
Clustering Gene Expression Patterns
Ben-Dor, A., Shamir, R., & Yakhini, Z. (1999) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/106652799318274 · Cited by 1,203
Tumor classification by partial least squares using microarray gene expression data
Nguyen, D. V., & Rocke, D. M. (2002) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.1.39 · Cited by 816
Coupled two-way clustering analysis of gene microarray data
Getz, G., Levine, E., & Domany, E. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.210134797 · Cited by 813
Cited by
McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471721182 · Cited by 10,991
Self-citationA Comprehensive Survey of Clustering Algorithms
Xu, D., & Tian, Y. (2015) · Annals of Data Science · doi:10.1007/s40745-015-0040-1 · Cited by 1,939
Cluster analysis for gene expression data: a survey
Jiang, D., Tang, C., & Zhang, A. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2004.68 · Cited by 1,235
A framework for feature selection in clustering
Witten, D. M., & Tibshirani, R. (2010) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09415 · Cited by 696
Variable Selection for Model-Based Clustering
Raftery, A. E., & Dean, N. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000113 · Cited by 521
Metadata
- Authors
- McLachlan, G. J., Bean, R. W., & Peel, D.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-03-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 413-422
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2152012752
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 10.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A mixture model-based approach to the clustering of microarray expression data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.413
- The paper
- McLachlan, G. J., Bean, R. W., & Peel, D. (2002). A mixture model-based approach to the clustering of microarray expression data. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.413
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.