The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Application of metabolomics to plant genotype discrimination using statistics and machine learning
Abstract
Motivation: Metabolomics is a post genomic technology which seeks to provide a comprehensive profile of all the metabolites present in a biological sample. This complements the mRNA profiles provided by microarrays, and the protein profiles provided by proteomics. To test the power of metabolome analysis we selected the problem of discrimating between related genotypes of Arabidopsis. Specifically, the problem tackled was to discrimate between two background genotypes (Col0 and C24) and, more significantly, the offspring produced by the crossbreeding of these two lines, the progeny (whose genotypes would differ only in their maternally inherited mitichondia and chloroplasts). Overview: A gas chromotography—mass spectrometry (GCMS) profiling protocol was used to identify 433 metabolites in the samples. The metabolomic profiles were compared using descriptive statistics which indicated that key primary metabolites vary more than other metabolites. We then applied neural networks to discriminate between the genotypes. This showed clearly that the two background lines can be discrimated between each other and their progeny, and indicated that the two progeny lines can also be discriminated. We applied Euclidean hierarchical and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to help understand the basis of genotype discrimination. PCA indicated that malic acid and citrate are the two most important metabolites for discriminating between the background lines, and glucose and fructose are two most important metabolites for discriminating between the crosses. These results are consistant with genotype differences in mitochondia and chloroplasts. Keywords: Metabolome, Arabidopsis, Clustering Contact: jat@aber.ac.uk
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Scalbert, A., Brennan, L., Fiehn, O., Hankemeier, T., Kristal, B. S., van Ommen, B., Pujos-Guillot, E., Verheij, E., Wishart, D., & Wopereis, S. (2009) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-009-0168-0 · Cited by 565
Self-citationMetabolomics and systems biology: making sense of the soup
KELL, D. (2004) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2004.04.012 · Cited by 529
Tikunov, Y., Lommen, A., de Vos, C. H. R., Verhoeven, H. A., Bino, R. J., Hall, R. D., & Bovy, A. G. (2005) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.105.068130 · Cited by 513
Natural products: A lead for drug discovery and development
Chopra, B., & Dhingra, A. K. (2021) · Phytotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/ptr.7099 · Cited by 469
Rochfort, S. (2005) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/np050255w · Cited by 465
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, J., King, R. D., Altmann, T., & Fiehn, O.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-10-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- suppl_2
- Pages
- S241-S248
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2125233704
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Application of metabolomics to plant genotype discrimination using statistics and machine learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_2.s241
- The paper
- Taylor, J., King, R. D., Altmann, T., & Fiehn, O. (2002). Application of metabolomics to plant genotype discrimination using statistics and machine learning. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_2.s241
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.