Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 550Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesProtein Structure and DynamicsFractal and DNA sequence analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Protein sequence alignments: a strategy for the hierarchical analysis of residue conservation

Abstract

An algorithm is described for the systematic characterization of the physico-chemical properties seen at each position in a multiple protein sequence alignment. The new algorithm allows questions important in the design of mutagenesis experiments to be quickly answered since positions in the alignment that show unusual or interesting residue substitution patterns may be rapidly identified. The strategy is based on a flexible set-based description of amino acid properties, which is used to define the conservation between any group of amino acids. Sequences in the alignment are gathered into subgroups on the basis of sequence similarity, functional, evolutionary or other criteria. All pairs of subgroups are then compared to highlight positions that confer the unique features of each subgroup. The algorithm is encoded in the computer program AMAS (Analysis of Multiply Aligned Sequences) which provides a textual summary of the analysis and an annotated (boxed, shaded and/or coloured) multiple sequence alignment. The algorithm is illustrated by application to an alignment of 67 SH2 domains where patterns of conserved hydrophobic residues that constitute the protein core are highlighted. The analysis of charge conservation across annexin domains identifies the locations at which conserved charges change sign. The algorithm simplifies the analysis of multiple sequence data by condensing the mass of information present, and thus allows the rapid identification of substitutions of structural and functional importance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/9.6.745

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

See all 550

Metadata

Authors
Livingstone, C. D., & Barton, G. J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
1993
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
745-756
ISSN
  • 0266-7061 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4803
  • 1460-2059
OpenAlex
W2132109794
Cited by
550
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computer applications in the biosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Society
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
Keywords
multiple sequence alignment, amino acid conservation, SH2 domain, hydrophobic core, charge conservation
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Chemistry, Physical, Molecular Sequence Data, Proteins, Software, Sequence Alignment, Conserved Sequence, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Chemical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein sequence alignments: a strategy for the hierarchical analysis of residue conservation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/9.6.745
The paper
Livingstone, C. D., & Barton, G. J. (1993). Protein sequence alignments: a strategy for the hierarchical analysis of residue conservation. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/9.6.745

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.