Improved survival analysis by learning shared genomic information from pan-cancer data
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Recent advances in deep learning have offered solutions to many biomedical tasks. However, there remains a challenge in applying deep learning to survival analysis using human cancer transcriptome data. As the number of genes, the input variables of survival model, is larger than the amount of available cancer patient samples, deep-learning models are prone to overfitting. To address the issue, we introduce a new deep-learning architecture called VAECox. VAECox uses transfer learning and fine tuning. Results: We pre-trained a variational autoencoder on all RNA-seq data in 20 TCGA datasets and transferred the trained weights to our survival prediction model. Then we fine-tuned the transferred weights during training the survival model on each dataset. Results show that our model outperformed other previous models such as Cox Proportional Hazard with LASSO and ridge penalty and Cox-nnet on the 7 of 10 TCGA datasets in terms of C-index. The results signify that the transferred information obtained from entire cancer transcriptome data helped our survival prediction model reduce overfitting and show robust performance in unseen cancer patient samples. Availability and implementation: Our implementation of VAECox is available at https://github.com/dmis-lab/VAECox. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The pretrain-and-finetune framework has shown effectiveness in computer vision learning, neural language processing, and biomedical learning for prognosis prediction and cancer dependency prediction.
“The pretrain-and-finetune framework has shown its effectiveness in computer vision learning, neural language processing, and biomedical learning for prognosis prediction [179] and cancer dependency prediction [180].”
From Challenges in AI-driven Biomedical Multimodal Data Fusion and Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [179]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 77
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- Bon E. et al (2016) SCN4B acts as a metastasis-suppressor gene preventing hyperactivation of cell migration in breast cancer. Nat. Commun., 7, 1– 18. PMC5150224 27917859
- Chaudhary K. et al (2018) Deep learning-based multi-omics integration robustly predicts survival in liver cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., 24, 1248– 1259. 28982688 PMC6050171
- Ching T. et al (2018) Cox-nnet: an artificial neural network method for prognosis prediction of high-throughput omics data. PLoS Comput. Biol., 14, e1006076. 29634719 PMC5909924
- Cho M.-H. et al (2015) DOT1L cooperates with the c-Myc-p300 complex to epigenetically derepress CDH1 transcription factors in breast cancer progression. Nat. Commun., 6, 1– 14. PMC4525167 26199140
- Cox D.R. (2018) Analysis of Survival Data. Routledge, England, UK.
- de Oca R.M. et al (2015) The histone chaperone HJURP is a new independent prognostic marker for luminal a breast carcinoma. Mol. Oncol., 9, 657– 674. 25497280 PMC5528705
- Dewa C.K. et al (2018) Suitable CNN weight initialization and activation function for Javanese vowels classification. Proc. Comput. Sci., 144, 124– 132.
- Dimitrakopoulos C. et al (2018) Network-based integration of multi-omics data for prioritizing cancer genes. Bioinformatics, 34, 2441– 2448. 29547932 PMC6041755
- Doersch C. (2016) Tutorial on variational autoencoders. CoRR, abs/1606.05908, http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05908. · arXiv
- Fernandes K. et al (2017) Transfer learning with partial observability applied to cervical cancer screening. In: Iberian Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, pp. 243– 250. Springer, NY, US.
- Fu W. et al (2019) BCAP31 drives TNBC development by modulating ligand-independent EGFR trafficking and spontaneous EGFR phosphorylation. Theranostics, 9, 6468– 6484. 31588230 PMC6771250
- Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell, 144, 646– 674. 21376230
- Hanin B., Rolnick D. (2018) How to start training: the effect of initialization and architecture. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, La Jolla, CA, pp. 571– 581.
- Harrell F.E. Jr, (2015) Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic and Ordinal Regression, and Survival Analysis. Springer, NY, US.
- Hinton G.E., Salakhutdinov R.R. (2006) Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 313, 504– 507. 16873662
- Hu Z. et al (2010) The expression level of HJURP has an independent prognostic impact and predicts the sensitivity to radiotherapy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res., 12, R18. 20211017 PMC2879562
- Huang C.-J. et al (2011) A predicted protein, KIAA0247, is a cell cycle modulator in colorectal cancer cells under 5-FU treatment. J. Transl. Med., 9, 82. 21619678 PMC3126726
- Huang L. et al (2019a) Driver network as a biomarker: systematic integration and network modeling of multi-omics data to derive driver signaling pathways for drug combination prediction. Bioinformatics, 35, 3709– 3717. 30768150 PMC6761967
- Jiang J. et al (2011) Ganodermanontriol (GDNT) exerts its effect on growth and invasiveness of breast cancer cells through the down-regulation of CDC20 and uPA. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 415, 325– 329. 22033405
- Kandaswamy C. et al (2016) High-content analysis of breast cancer using single-cell deep transfer learning. J. Biomol. Screen., 21, 252– 259. 26746583
- Karra H. et al (2014) Cdc20 and securin overexpression predict short-term breast cancer survival. Br. J. Cancer, 110, 2905– 2913. 24853182 PMC4056061
- Kingma D.P., Welling M. (2013) Auto-encoding variational Bayes. CoRR, abs/1312.6114, http://arxiv.org/1312.6114. · arXiv
- Lee J.-Y., Kong G. (2015) Dot1l: a new therapeutic target for aggressive breast cancer. Oncotarget, 6, 30451– 30452. 26427043 PMC4741543
- Lerebours F. et al (2008) NF-kappa B genes have a major role in inflammatory breast cancer. BMC Cancer, 8, 41. 18248671 PMC2267801
- Li Y.-Y. et al (2013) Down-regulation of C9orf86 in human breast cancer cells inhibits cell proliferation, invasion and tumor growth and correlates with survival of breast cancer patients. PLoS One, 8, e71764. 23977139 PMC3743754
- Li Y. et al (2016) Transfer learning for survival analysis via efficient l2, 1-norm regularized cox regression. In: 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 231– 240. IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey, US.
- Li S. et al (2017) Initializing convolutional filters with semantic features for text classification. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1884– 1889.
- Lussier Y.A., Li H. (2012) Breakthroughs in genomics data integration for predicting clinical outcome. J. Biomed. Inf., 45, 1199– 1201. PMC3632294 23117078
- Mannelqvist M. et al (2014) An 18-gene signature for vascular invasion is associated with aggressive features and reduced survival in breast cancer. PLoS One, 9, e98787. 24905342 PMC4048217
- Meng L. et al (2016) Biomarker discovery to improve prediction of breast cancer survival: using gene expression profiling, meta-analysis, and tissue validation. OncoTargets Ther., 9, 6177– 6185. PMC5067006 27785066
- Nassa G. et al (2019) Inhibition of histone methyltransferase DOT1L silences ERα gene and blocks proliferation of antiestrogen-resistant breast cancer cells. Sci. Adv., 5, eaav5590. 30775443 PMC6365116
- Nicholson R. et al (2001) EGFR and cancer prognosis. Eur. J. Cancer, 37, 9– 15. 11597399
- Pan S.J., Yang Q. (2010) A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 22, 1345– 1359.
- Polato F. et al (2014) DRAGO (KIAA0247), a new DNA damage–responsive, p53-inducible gene that cooperates with p53 as oncosuppressor. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 106, 4. PMC3988459 24652652
- Press W.H. et al (2007) Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
- Rendle S. (2012) Factorization machines with libFM. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol., 3, 1– 22.
- Sutskever I. et al (2013) On the importance of initialization and momentum in deep learning. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, ACM, NY, pp. 1139– 1147.
- Titus A.J. et al (2017) Deconvolution of DNA methylation identifies differentially methylated gene regions on 1p36 across breast cancer subtypes. Sci. Rep., 7, 1– 9. 28912426 PMC5599639
- Tomczak K. et al (2015) The cancer genome atlas (TCGA): an immeasurable source of knowledge. Contemp. Oncol., 1A, 68– 77. PMC4322527 25691825
- Valdes Mora F. et al (2018) Single-cell transcriptomics in cancer immunobiology: the future of precision oncology. Front. Immunol., 9, 2582. 30483257 PMC6240655
- Van’t Veer L.J. et al (2002) Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature, 415, 530– 536. 11823860
- Venter J.C. et al (2001) The sequence of the human genome. Science, 291, 1304– 1351. 11181995
- Yoshimura K. et al (2016) A novel prognostic marker of non-small cell lung cancer: chromosome 9 open reading frame 86 (C9orf86). J. Thoracic Dis., 8, 2284– 2286. PMC5059359 27746955
- Authors
- Kim, S., Kim, K., Choe, J., Lee, I., & Kang, J.
- Affiliations
- Korea University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Kang, Jaewoo
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-07-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- Supplement_1
- Pages
- i389-i398
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- PMC
- PMC7355236
- OpenAlex
- W3043242675
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017R1A2A1A17069645, NRF-2016M3A9A7916996, NRF-2014M3C9A3063541)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Keywords
- survival analysis, pan-cancer, variational autoencoder, transfer learning, fine-tuning, RNA-seq, tumor transcriptome, overfitting, TCGA, Cox proportional hazards model, survival prediction
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Humans, Neoplasms, Survival Analysis, Genome, Genomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review