Cited by 67Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Deep graph learning of inter-protein contacts

Open access
Xie, Ziwei, Xu, Jinbo·2022·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: Inter-protein (interfacial) contact prediction is very useful for in silico structural characterization of protein–protein interactions. Although deep learning has been applied to this problem, its accuracy is not as good as intra-protein contact prediction. Results: We propose a new deep learning method GLINTER (Graph Learning of INTER-protein contacts) for interfacial contact prediction of dimers, leveraging a rotational invariant representation of protein tertiary structures and a pretrained language model of multiple sequence alignments. Tested on the 13th and 14th CASP-CAPRI datasets, the average top L/10 precision achieved by GLINTER is 54% on the homodimers and 52% on all the dimers, much higher than 30% obtained by the latest deep learning method DeepHomo on the homodimers and 15% obtained by BIPSPI on all the dimers. Our experiments show that GLINTER-predicted contacts help improve selection of docking decoys. Availability and implementation: The software is available at https://github.com/zw2x/glinter. The datasets are available at https://github.com/zw2x/glinter/data. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab761

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Xie, Z., & Xu, J.
Affiliations
Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Xu, Jinbo
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2021-11-10
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
947-953
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W3211403530
Cited by
67
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 13
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01GM089753)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, protein dimer, graph neural networks, homodimer
MeSH terms
Proteins, Software, Sequence Alignment, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review