Structural analogue-based protein structure domain assembly assisted by deep learning
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Motivation: With the breakthrough of AlphaFold2, the protein structure prediction problem has made remarkable progress through deep learning end-to-end techniques, in which correct folds could be built for nearly all single-domain proteins. However, the full-chain modelling appears to be lower on average accuracy than that for the constituent domains and requires higher demand on computing hardware, indicating the performance of full-chain modelling still needs to be improved. In this study, we investigate whether the predicted accuracy of the full-chain model can be further improved by domain assembly assisted by deep learning. Results: In this article, we developed a structural analogue-based protein structure domain assembly method assisted by deep learning, named SADA. In SADA, a multi-domain protein structure database was constructed for the full-chain analogue detection using individual domain models. Starting from the initial model constructed from the analogue, the domain assembly simulation was performed to generate the full-chain model through a two-stage differential evolution algorithm guided by the energy function with an inter-residue distance potential predicted by deep learning. SADA was compared with the state-of-the-art domain assembly methods on 356 benchmark proteins, and the average TM-score of SADA models is 8.1% and 27.0% higher than that of DEMO and AIDA, respectively. We also assembled 293 human multi-domain proteins, where the average TM-score of the full-chain model after the assembly by SADA is 1.1% higher than that of the model by AlphaFold2. To conclude, we find that the domains often interact in the similar way in the quaternary orientations if the domains have similar tertiary structures. Furthermore, homologous templates and structural analogues are complementary for multi-domain protein full-chain modelling. Availability and implementation: http://zhanglab-bioinf.com/SADA Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome
Tunyasuvunakool, K., Adler, J., Wu, Z., Green, T., Zielinski, M., Žídek, A., Bridgland, A., Cowie, A., Meyer, C., Laydon, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · Cited by 3,025 · see citing works
Protein-level assembly increases protein sequence recovery from metagenomic samples manyfold
Steinegger, M., Mirdita, M., & Söding, J. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0437-4 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Vreven, T., Moal, I. H., Vangone, A., Pierce, B. G., Kastritis, P. L., Torchala, M., Chaleil, R., Jiménez-García, B., Bates, P. A., Fernandez-Recio, J., et al. (2015) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2015.07.016 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Xia, Y., Pu, Y., Wang, S., Zhuang, J., Liu, D., Hou, M., & Zhang, G. (2025) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169128 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Peng, C.-X., Zhou, X.-G., Xia, Y.-H., Liu, J., Hou, M.-H., & Zhang, G.-J.
- Affiliations
- College of Information Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology , Hangzhou 310023, China
- Zhejiang University of Technology (CN)
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-08-13
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 4513-4521
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W4291237297
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- New Generation Artificial Intelligence’ major project of Science and Technology Innovation 2030 of the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2021ZD0150100)
- National Nature Science Foundation of China (62173304, 61773346)
- Key Project of Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LZ20F030002)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- structural analogues, multidomain proteins, differential evolution, quaternary structure, Sada
- MeSH terms
- Protein Domains, Deep Learning, Humans, Proteins, Software, Databases, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review