Cited by 55Machine Learning in BioinformaticsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesProtein Structure and Dynamics

Embedding-based alignment: combining protein language models with dynamic programming alignment to detect structural similarities in the twilight-zone

Open access
Pantolini, Lorenzo, Studer, Gabriel, Pereira, Joana, Durairaj, Janani, Tauriello, Gerardo, Schwede, Torsten·2024·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: Language models are routinely used for text classification and generative tasks. Recently, the same architectures were applied to protein sequences, unlocking powerful new approaches in the bioinformatics field. Protein language models (pLMs) generate high-dimensional embeddings on a per-residue level and encode a “semantic meaning” of each individual amino acid in the context of the full protein sequence. These representations have been used as a starting point for downstream learning tasks and, more recently, for identifying distant homologous relationships between proteins. Results: In this work, we introduce a new method that generates embedding-based protein sequence alignments (EBA) and show how these capture structural similarities even in the twilight zone, outperforming both classical methods as well as other approaches based on pLMs. The method shows excellent accuracy despite the absence of training and parameter optimization. We demonstrate that the combination of pLMs with alignment methods is a valuable approach for the detection of relationships between proteins in the twilight-zone. Availability and implementation: The code to run EBA and reproduce the analysis described in this article is available at: https://git.scicore.unibas.ch/schwede/EBA and https://git.scicore.unibas.ch/schwede/eba_benchmark.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad786

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Pantolini, L., Studer, G., Pereira, J., Durairaj, J., Tauriello, G., & Schwede, T.
Affiliations
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
Corresponding author
Schwede, Torsten
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2024-01-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W4390590489
Cited by
55
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
  • Biozentrum, University of Basel
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein language models, protein sequence alignment, structural similarity, twilight zone, distant homology detection, dynamic programming alignment, protein embeddings, protein structure comparison
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Amino Acids, Language, Proteins, Sequence Alignment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review