Cited by 3Machine Learning in BioinformaticsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In silico identification of archaeal DNA-binding proteins

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: The rapid advancement of next-generation sequencing technologies has generated an immense volume of genetic data. However, these data are unevenly distributed, with well-studied organisms being disproportionately represented, while other organisms, such as from archaea, remain significantly underexplored. The study of archaea is particularly challenging due to the extreme environments they inhabit and the difficulties associated with culturing them in the laboratory. Despite these challenges, archaea likely represent a crucial evolutionary link between eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms, and their investigation could shed light on the early stages of life on Earth. Yet, a significant portion of archaeal proteins are annotated with limited or inaccurate information. Among the various classes of archaeal proteins, DNA-binding proteins are of particular importance. While they represent a large portion of every known proteome, their identification in archaea is complicated by the substantial evolutionary divergence between archaeal and the other better studied organisms. Results: To address the challenges of identifying DNA-binding proteins in archaea, we developed Xenusia, a neural network-based tool capable of screening entire archaeal proteomes to identify DNA-binding proteins. Xenusia has proven effective across diverse datasets, including metagenomics data, successfully identifying novel DNA-binding proteins, with experimental validation of its predictions. Availability and implementation: Xenusia is available as a PyPI package, with source code accessible at https://github.com/grogdrinker/xenusia, and as a Google Colab web server application at xenusia.ipynb.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf169

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Aravind, 1999, DNA-binding proteins and evolution of transcription regulation in the archaea, Nucleic Acids Res, 27, 4658, 10.1093/nar/27.23.4658 · DOI
  2. Brinkman, 2002, The Sulfolobus solfataricus Lrp-like protein LysM regulates lysine biosynthesis in response to lysine availability, J Biol Chem, 277, 29537, 10.1074/jbc.M203528200 · DOI
  3. Brinkman, 2000, An Lrp-like transcriptional regulator from the archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus is negatively autoregulated, J Biol Chem, 275, 38160, 10.1074/jbc.M005916200 · DOI
  4. Cilia, 2014, The DynaMine webserver: predicting protein dynamics from sequence, Nucleic Acids Res, 42, W264, 10.1093/nar/gku270 · DOI
  5. Coudert, 2023, Annotation of biologically relevant ligands in UniProtKB using ChEBI, Bioinformatics, 39, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac793 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Davidson, 2008, Structure, function, and evolution of bacterial ATP-binding cassette systems, Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 72, 317, 10.1128/MMBR.00031-07 · DOI
  7. Emerson, 2016, Metagenomic analysis of a high carbon dioxide subsurface microbial community populated by chemolithoautotrophs and bacteria and archaea from candidate phyla, Environ Microbiol, 18, 1686, 10.1111/1462-2920.12817 · DOI
  8. Hudson, 2014, The structure, function and evolution of proteins that bind DNA and RNA, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 15, 749, 10.1038/nrm3884 · DOI
  9. Iovine, 2011, Damage-specific DNA binding protein 1 (DDB1): a protein with a wide range of functions, Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 43, 1664, 10.1016/j.biocel.2011.09.001 · DOI
  10. Jorgensen, 2012, Correlating microbial community profiles with geochemical data in highly stratified sediments from the Arctic Mid-Ocean ridge, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109, E2846, 10.1073/pnas.1207574109 · DOI
  11. Li, 2006, Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences, Bioinformatics, 22, 1658, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · DOI
  12. Maté, 2004, Structure-based analysis of the metal-dependent mechanism of H-N-H endonucleases, J Biol Chem, 279, 34763, 10.1074/jbc.M403719200 · DOI
  13. Meng, 2023, Improved structure-related prediction for insufficient homologous proteins using MSA enhancement and pre-trained language model, Brief Bioinform, 24, 10.1093/bib/bbad217 · DOI
  14. Orlando, 2022, Prediction of disordered regions in proteins with recurrent neural networks and protein dynamics, J Mol Biol, 434, 167579, 10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167579 · DOI
  15. Orlando, 2017, SVM-dependent pairwise HMM: an application to protein pairwise alignments, Bioinformatics, 33, 3902, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx391 · DOI
  16. Orlando, 2016, Observation selection bias in contact prediction and its implications for structural bioinformatics, Sci Rep, 6, 36679, 10.1038/srep36679 · DOI
  17. Parks, 2017, Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life, Nat. Microbiol, 2, 1533, 10.1038/s41564-017-0012-7 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Raimondi, 2017, Exploring the sequence-based prediction of folding initiation sites in proteins, Sci Rep, 7, 8826, 10.1038/s41598-017-08366-3 · DOI
  19. Steinhuber, 2003, Molecular architecture of the regulatory locus SAE of Staphylococcus aureus and its impact on expression of virulence factors, J Bacteriol, 185, 6278, 10.1128/JB.185.21.6278-6286.2003 · DOI
  20. Zaman, 2017, HMMBinder: DNA-binding protein prediction using HMM profile based features, Biomed Res Int, 2017, 4590609, 10.1155/2017/4590609 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Donvil, L., Housmans, J. A. J., Peeters, E., Vranken, W., & Orlando, G.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Orlando, Gabriele
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2025-05
Volume
41
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W4410028085
Cited by
3
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  • University of Montpellier and by an ANR (ANR-23-CPJ1-0061)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein function prediction, neural network classifier, archaeal proteome, metagenomics, protein annotation, early evolution of life, archaea
MeSH terms
Archaea, Computer Simulation, DNA-Binding Proteins, Software, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology, Archaeal Proteins, Proteome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review