Cited by 5Machine Learning in BioinformaticsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksProtein Structure and Dynamics

GOBoost: leveraging long-tail gene ontology terms for accurate protein function prediction

Open access
Zhang, Lei, Wang, Yang, Chen, Xiao, Hou, Jie, Si, Dong, Ding, Rui, Jiang, Bo, Ledenko, Hailey +1 more·2025·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: With the advancement of deep learning, researchers have increasingly proposed computational methods based on deep learning techniques to predict protein function. However, many of these methods treat protein function prediction as a multi-label classification problem, often overlooking the long-tail distribution of functional labels (i.e., Gene Ontology Terms) in datasets. To address this issue, we propose the GOBoost method, which incorporates the proposed long-tail optimization ensemble strategy. Besides, GOBoost introduces the proposed global-local label graph module and multi-granularity focal loss function to enhance long-tail functional information, mitigate the long-tail phenomenon, and improve overall prediction accuracy. Results: We evaluate GOBoost and other state-of-the-art (SOTA) protein function prediction methods on the PDB and AF2 datasets. The GOBoost outperformed SOTA methods on all evaluation metrics for both datasets. Notably, in the AUPR evaluation on the PDB test set, GOBoost improved by 10.71%, 35.91%, and 22.71% compared to the SOTA HEAL method in the MF, BP, and CC functions. The experimental results show the necessity and superiority of designing models from the label long-tail distribution perspective. Availability and implementation: The source code of GOBoost is available at https://github.com/Cao-Labs/GOBoost.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf267

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Chen, X., Hou, J., Si, D., Ding, R., Jiang, B., Ledenko, H., & Cao, R.
Affiliations
  • Anhui University (CN)
  • Hamilton College (US)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
  • University of Washington Bothell (US)
  • Pacific Lutheran University (US)
Corresponding author
Cao, Renzhi
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2025-06
Volume
41
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W4411755785
Cited by
5
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61976001)
  • Anhui Provincial Department of Education (gxyqZD2021089)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (2408085MF152)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein function prediction, Gene Ontology terms, long-tailed distributions, ensemble learning, labeled graphs, multi-label classification, deep learning
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Algorithms, Proteins, Software, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein, Gene Ontology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review