Cited by 56Machine Learning in BioinformaticsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksProtein Structure and Dynamics

Deep learning methods for protein function prediction

Open access
Boadu, Frimpong, Lee, Ahhyun, Cheng, Jianlin·2025·PROTEOMICS

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Predicting protein function from protein sequence, structure, interaction, and other relevant information is important for generating hypotheses for biological experiments and studying biological systems, and therefore has been a major challenge in protein bioinformatics. Numerous computational methods had been developed to advance protein function prediction gradually in the last two decades. Particularly, in the recent years, leveraging the revolutionary advances in artificial intelligence (AI), more and more deep learning methods have been developed to improve protein function prediction at a faster pace. Here, we provide an in‐depth review of the recent developments of deep learning methods for protein function prediction. We summarize the significant advances in the field, identify several remaining major challenges to be tackled, and suggest some potential directions to explore. The data sources and evaluation metrics widely used in protein function prediction are also discussed to assist the machine learning, AI, and bioinformatics communities to develop more cutting‐edge methods to advance protein function prediction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.202300471

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boadu, F., Lee, A., & Cheng, J.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Jianlin
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-07-12
Volume
25
Issue
1-2
Pages
e2300471-e2300471
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W4400576356
Cited by
53
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PROTEOMICS (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Division of Biological Infrastructure (2308699)
  • National Science Foundation (DBI2308699, CCF2343612)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01GM093123, R01GM146340)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein function prediction, deep learning, protein sequences, protein structure, protein-protein interaction, evaluation metrics, data sources
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Humans, Proteins, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review