Cited by 4Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsBacteriophages and microbial interactions

SPAED: harnessing AlphaFold output for accurate segmentation of phage endolysin domains

Open access
Boulay, Alexandre, Cremelie, Emma, Galiez, Clovis, Briers, Yves, Rousseau, Elsa, Vázquez, Roberto·2025·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Summary: SPAED is an accessible tool for the accurate segmentation of protein domains that leverages information contained in the predicted aligned error (PAE) matrix obtained from AlphaFold to better identify domain-linker boundaries and detect terminal disordered regions. On a dataset of 376 bacteriophage endolysins (proteins that degrade the bacterial cell wall), SPAED achieves a mean intersect-over-union score of 96% and a domain-boundary-distance score of 89% compared to 94% and 70%, respectively, for the state-of-the-art tool Chainsaw. Availability and implementation: Implemented in Python, SPAED is accessible on the web (https://spaed.ca) and available for download from https://github.com/Rousseau-Team/spaed or https://pypi.org/project/spaed. The data used to test SPAED can be found at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15285860.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf531

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Boulay, A., Cremelie, E., Galiez, C., Briers, Y., Rousseau, E., & Vázquez, R.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR)
  • Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Rousseau, Elsa
  • Vázquez, Roberto
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2025-09-24
Volume
41
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W4414458008
Cited by
4
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Fonds de recherche du Québec secteur Nature et technologies (325947)
  • CREATE Responsible Health and Healthcare Data Science
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Mitacs Globalink Research program (IT41138)
  • Research Scholars—Junior 1
  • Fonds de recherche du Québec secteur Santé (307935)
  • Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds (01P10022)
  • 2024 from the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
  • Research Foundation—Flanders (1S15424N)
  • Compute Ontario
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
Keywords
endolysin, AlphaFold, intrinsically disordered regions, protein structure prediction
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Bacteriophages, Endopeptidases, Software, Viral Proteins, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review