PreprintCited by 53Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

Chainsaw: protein domain segmentation with fully convolutional neural networks

Open access
Wells, Jude, Hawkins-Hooker, Alex, Bordin, Nicola, Sillitoe, Ian, Paige, Brooks, Orengo, Christine·2023·Bioinformatics

Preprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae296 · Paper page

Abstract

0.1 Motivation: Protein domains are fundamental units of protein structure and play a pivotal role in understanding folding, function, evolution, and design. The advent of accurate structure prediction techniques has resulted in an influx of new structural data, making the partitioning of these structures into domains essential for inferring evolutionary relationships and functional classification. 0.2 Results: This manuscript presents Chainsaw, a supervised learning approach to domain parsing that achieves accuracy that surpasses current state-of-the-art methods. Chainsaw uses a fully convolutional neural network which is trained to predict the probability that each pair of residues is in the same domain. Domain predictions are then derived from these pairwise predictions using an algorithm that searches for the most likely assignment of residues to domains given the set of pairwise co-membership probabilities. Chainsaw matches CATH domain annotations in 78% of protein domains versus 72% for the next closest method. When predicting on AlphaFold models expert human evaluators were twice as likely to prefer Chainsaw’s predictions versus the next best method. 0.3 Availability and Implementation: Code implementation of Chainsaw is available at github.com/JudeWells/chainsaw .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.07.19.549732

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wells, J., Hawkins-Hooker, A., Bordin, N., Sillitoe, I., Paige, B., & Orengo, C.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology (GB)
Corresponding author
Orengo, Christine
Venue
Bioinformatics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-07-19
Volume
40
Issue
5
ISSN
1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396730528
Cited by
53
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 1
FWCI
6.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Alan Turing Institute
  • Medical Research Council (HDR-23005)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/S021566/1)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/W018802/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein structure annotation, fully convolutional network, AlphaFold models, protein structure prediction
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Algorithms, Humans, Proteins, Software, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review