The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observing and interpreting correlations in metabolomic networks
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Metabolite profiling aims at an unbiased identification and quantification of all the metabolites present in a biological sample. Based on their pair-wise correlations, the data obtained from metabolomic experiments are organized into metabolic correlation networks and the key challenge is to deduce unknown pathways based on the observed correlations. However, the data generated is fundamentally different from traditional biological measurements and thus the analysis is often restricted to rather pragmatic approaches, such as data mining tools, to discriminate between different metabolic phenotypes. Methods and Results: We investigate to what extent the data generated networks reflect the structure of the underlying biochemical pathways. The purpose of this work is 2-fold: Based on the theory of stochastic systems, we first introduce a framework which shows that the emergent correlations can be interpreted as a‘ fingerprint’ of the underlying biophysical system. This result leads to a systematic relationship between observed correlation networks and the underlying biochemical pathways. In a second step, we investigate to what extent our result is applicable to the problem of reverse engineering, i.e. to recover the underlying enzymatic reaction network from data. The implications of our findings for other bioinformatics approaches are discussed. Contact: steuer@agnld.uni-potsdam.de * To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks
Thattai, M., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.151588598 · Cited by 1,428 · cited 1×
“Recently, there has been much interest in fluctuations and stochastic mechanisms within molecular networks (Rao et al., 2002; Thattai and van Oudenaarden, 2001; Morton-Firth and Bray, 1998; McAdams and Arkin, 1997).”
BackgroundStatistical construction of chemical reaction mechanisms from measured time-series
Arkin, A., & Ross, J. (1995) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100003a020 · Cited by 143
Cited by
Metabolomics by numbers: acquiring and understanding global metabolite data
Goodacre, R., Vaidyanathan, S., Dunn, W. B., Harrigan, G. G., & Kell, D. B. (2004) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.03.007 · Cited by 1,249
Statistical strategies for avoiding false discoveries in metabolomics and related experiments
Broadhurst, D. I., & Kell, D. B. (2007) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-006-0037-z · Cited by 817
Metabolomics for Functional Genomics, Systems Biology, and Biotechnology
Saito, K., & Matsuda, F. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092035 · Cited by 744
Discovery of meaningful associations in genomic data using partial correlation coefficients
de la Fuente, A., Bing, N., Hoeschele, I., & Mendes, P. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth445 · Cited by 553
Metabolomics and systems biology: making sense of the soup
KELL, D. (2004) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2004.04.012 · Cited by 529
Metadata
- Authors
- Steuer, R., Kurths, J., Fiehn, O., & Weckwerth, W.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-05-22
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1019-1026
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2122827157
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observing and interpreting correlations in metabolomic networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg120
- The paper
- Steuer, R., Kurths, J., Fiehn, O., & Weckwerth, W. (2003). Observing and interpreting correlations in metabolomic networks. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.