The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating semantic similarity measures across the Gene Ontology: the relationship between sequence and annotation
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Many bioinformatics data resources not only hold data in the form of sequences, but also as annotation. In the majority of cases, annotation is written as scientific natural language: this is suitable for humans, but not particularly useful for machine processing. Ontologies offer a mechanism by which knowledge can be represented in a form capable of such processing. In this paper we investigate the use of ontological annotation to measure the similarities in knowledge content or‘ semantic similarity’ between entries in a data resource. These allow a bioinformatician to perform a similarity measure over annotation in an analogous manner to those performed over sequences. A measure of semantic similarity for the knowledge component of bioinformatics resources should afford a biologist a new tool in their repetoire of analyses. Results: We present the results from experiments that investigate the validity of using semantic similarity by comparison with sequence similarity. We show a simple extension that enables a semantic search of the knowledge held within sequence databases. Availability: Software available from http://www.russet.org.uk Contact: p.lord@russet.org.uk * To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Cited by
GOSemSim: an R package for measuring semantic similarity among GO terms and gene products
Yu, G., Li, F., Qin, Y., Bo, X., Wu, Y., & Wang, S. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq064 · Cited by 1,388
Wang, D., Wang, J., Lu, M., Song, F., & Cui, Q. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq241 · Cited by 913
Coexpression Analysis of Human Genes Across Many Microarray Data Sets
Lee, H. K., Hsu, A. K., Sajdak, J., Qin, J., & Pavlidis, P. (2004) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1910904 · Cited by 770
Clinical Diagnostics in Human Genetics with Semantic Similarity Searches in Ontologies
Köhler, S., Schulz, M. H., Krawitz, P., Bauer, S., Dölken, S., Ott, C. E., Mundlos, C., Horn, D., Mundlos, S., & Robinson, P. N. (2009) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.09.003 · Cited by 590
Zhou, N., Jiang, Y., Bergquist, T. R., Lee, A. J., Kacsoh, B. Z., Crocker, A. W., Lewis, K. A., Georghiou, G., Nguyen, H. N., Hamid, M. N., et al. (2019) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1835-8 · Cited by 452
Metadata
- Authors
- Lord, P. W., Stevens, R. D., Brass, A., & Goble, C. A.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-07-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1275-1283
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2127563440
- Cited by
- 843
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigating semantic similarity measures across the Gene Ontology: the relationship between sequence and annotation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg153
- The paper
- Lord, P. W., Stevens, R. D., Brass, A., & Goble, C. A. (2003). Investigating semantic similarity measures across the Gene Ontology: the relationship between sequence and annotation. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg153
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.