The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An evaluation of new criteria for CpG islands in the human genome as gene markers
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Recently, more stringent criteria for CpG islands have been introduced to exclude Alu repeats, thereby enabling a higher proportion of CpG islands associating with genes to be identified. Using these new criteria, several types of associations between CpG islands and genes were investigated to further establish the importance of CpG islands as gene markers. Results: The CpG islands were searched by CpGIE, a java software program developed for CpG island identification. CpGIE was advanced in identification accuracy compared with other tools. According to our results, about 70% of the identified CpG islands were associating with the human genes and over half of them are in the promoters. Furthermore, the investigation of genes in the confirmed gene model showed that 56% of them had a CpG island overlapping the transcription start sites. In comparison, the new criteria were found capable of filtering a large fraction of Alu repeats that was identified as CpG islands by the generally accepted criteria within the genes, but very few CpG islands associating with the promoters were affected. The genes in the predicted gene model were not obviously associated with CpG islands, suggesting that CpG islands can be used to evaluate the accuracy of gene annotation. Availability: http://bioinfo.hku.hk/cpgieintro
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory
Bird, A. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.947102 · Cited by 7,124
CpG islands as gene markers in the human genome
Larsen, F., Gundersen, G., Lopez, R., & Prydz, H. (1992) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/0888-7543(92)90024-m · Cited by 922
Cited by
Sharma, S., Kelly, T. K., & Jones, P. A. (2010) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgp220 · Cited by 2,637
Cancer epigenetics reaches mainstream oncology
Rodríguez-Paredes, M., & Esteller, M. (2011) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2305 · Cited by 1,205
Transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms of addiction
Robison, A. J., & Nestler, E. J. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3111 · Cited by 993
Evaluation of the Infinium Methylation 450K technology
Dedeurwaerder, S., Defrance, M., Calonne, E., Denis, H., Sotiriou, C., & Fuks, F. (2011) · Epigenomics · doi:10.2217/epi.11.105 · Cited by 569
Price, E. M., Cotton, A. M., Lam, L. L., Farré, P., Emberly, E., Brown, C. J., Robinson, W. P., & Kobor, M. S. (2013) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/1756-8935-6-4 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., & Leung, F. C. C.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-02-05
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1170-1177
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2153432157
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An evaluation of new criteria for CpG islands in the human genome as gene markers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth059
- The paper
- Wang, Y., & Leung, F. C. C. (2004). An evaluation of new criteria for CpG islands in the human genome as gene markers. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.