The DOI matches its Crossref record.
BioRAT: extracting biological information from full-length papers
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Converting the vast quantity of free-format text found in journals into a concise, structured format makes the researcher's quest for information easier. Recently, several information extraction systems have been developed that attempt to simplify the retrieval and analysis of biological and medical data. Most of this work has used the abstract alone, owing to the convenience of access and the quality of data. Abstracts are generally available through central collections with easy direct access (e.g. PubMed). The full-text papers contain more information, but are distributed across many locations (e.g. publishers' web sites, journal web sites and local repositories), making access more difficult. In this paper, we present BioRAT, a new information extraction (IE) tool, specifically designed to perform biomedical IE, and which is able to locate and analyse both abstracts and full-length papers. BioRAT is a Biological Research Assistant for Text mining, and incorporates a document search ability with domain-specific IE. Results: We show first, that BioRAT performs as well as existing systems, when applied to abstracts; and second, that significantly more information is available to BioRAT through the full-length papers than via the abstracts alone. Typically, less than half of the available information is extracted from the abstract, with the majority coming from the body of each paper. Overall, BioRAT recalled 20.31% of the target facts from the abstracts with 55.07% precision, and achieved 43.6% recall with 51.25% precision on full-length papers. Availability: The software and documentation can be found at http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/biorat
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smart health: Big data enabled health paradigm within smart cities
Pramanik, M. I., Lau, R. Y. K., Demirkan, H., & Azad, M. A. K. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.06.027 · Cited by 341
Text mining and its potential applications in systems biology
Ananiadou, S., Kell, D. B., & Tsujii, J.-I. (2006) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.10.002 · Cited by 324
Concept annotation in the CRAFT corpus
Bada, M., Eckert, M., Evans, D., Garcia, K., Shipley, K., Sitnikov, D., Baumgartner, W. A., Cohen, K. B., Verspoor, K., Blake, J. A., et al. (2012) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-161 · Cited by 272
Cohen, K. B., Johnson, H. L., Verspoor, K., Roeder, C., & Hunter, L. E. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-492 · Cited by 174
PDF text classification to leverage information extraction from publication reports
Bui, D. D. A., Del Fiol, G., & Jonnalagadda, S. (2016) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2016.03.026 · Cited by 52
“Natural language processing (NLP) research in the past decade has investigated techniques to extract study characteristics from biomedical publications (10-19).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Corney, D. P. A., Buxton, B. F., Langdon, W. B., & Jones, D. T.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-07-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3206-3213
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2122904379
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BioRAT: extracting biological information from full-length papers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth386
- The paper
- Corney, D. P. A., Buxton, B. F., Langdon, W. B., & Jones, D. T. (2004). BioRAT: extracting biological information from full-length papers. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth386
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.