The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Concept annotation in the CRAFT corpus
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Manually annotated corpora are critical for the training and evaluation of automated methods to identify concepts in biomedical text. RESULTS: This paper presents the concept annotations of the Colorado Richly Annotated Full-Text (CRAFT) Corpus, a collection of 97 full-length, open-access biomedical journal articles that have been annotated both semantically and syntactically to serve as a research resource for the biomedical natural-language-processing (NLP) community. CRAFT identifies all mentions of nearly all concepts from nine prominent biomedical ontologies and terminologies: the Cell Type Ontology, the Chemical Entities of Biological Interest ontology, the NCBI Taxonomy, the Protein Ontology, the Sequence Ontology, the entries of the Entrez Gene database, and the three subontologies of the Gene Ontology. The first public release includes the annotations for 67 of the 97 articles, reserving two sets of 15 articles for future text-mining competitions (after which these too will be released). Concept annotations were created based on a single set of guidelines, which has enabled us to achieve consistently high interannotator agreement. CONCLUSIONS: As the initial 67-article release contains more than 560,000 tokens (and the full set more than 790,000 tokens), our corpus is among the largest gold-standard annotated biomedical corpora. Unlike most others, the journal articles that comprise the corpus are drawn from diverse biomedical disciplines and are marked up in their entirety. Additionally, with a concept-annotation count of nearly 100,000 in the 67-article subset (and more than 140,000 in the full collection), the scale of conceptual markup is also among the largest of comparable corpora. The concept annotations of the CRAFT Corpus have the potential to significantly advance biomedical text mining by providing a high-quality gold standard for NLP systems. The corpus, annotation guidelines, and other associated resources are freely available at http://bionlp-corpora.sourceforge.net/CRAFT/index.shtml.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Self-citationHuang, D. W., Sherman, B. T., & Lempicki, R. A. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn923 · Cited by 14,108
Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information: update
Wheeler, D. L. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh073 · Cited by 10,641
The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration
The OBI Consortium, Smith, B., Ashburner, M., Rosse, C., Bard, J., Bug, W., Ceusters, W., Goldberg, L. J., Eilbeck, K., Ireland, A., et al. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1346 · Cited by 2,560
Entrez Gene: gene-centered information at NCBI
Maglott, D., Ostell, J., Pruitt, K. D., & Tatusova, T. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq1237 · Cited by 2,094
GENIA corpus—a semantically annotated corpus for bio-textmining
Kim, J.-D., Ohta, T., Tateisi, Y., & Tsujii, J. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1023 · Cited by 1,232
The evolution of Protégé: an environment for knowledge-based systems development
Gennari, J. H., Musen, M. A., Fergerson, R. W., Grosso, W. E., Crubézy, M., Eriksson, H., Noy, N. F., & Tu, S. W. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(02)00127-1 · Cited by 1,137
ChEBI: a database and ontology for chemical entities of biological interest
Degtyarenko, K., de Matos, P., Ennis, M., Hastings, J., Zbinden, M., McNaught, A., Alcantara, R., Darsow, M., Guedj, M., & Ashburner, M. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm791 · Cited by 1,126
Ontological analysis of gene expression data: current tools, limitations, and open problems
Khatri, P., & Drăghici, S. (2005) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti565 · Cited by 854
Lord, P. W., Stevens, R. D., Brass, A., & Goble, C. A. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg153 · Cited by 843
Cited by
NCBI disease corpus: A resource for disease name recognition and concept normalization
Doğan, R. I., Leaman, R., & Lu, Z. (2014) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2013.12.006 · Cited by 820
Constructing knowledge graphs and their biomedical applications
Nicholson, D. N., & Greene, C. S. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.05.017 · Cited by 299
Information retrieval and text mining technologies for chemistry
Krallinger, M., Rabal, O., Lourenço, A., Oyarzabal, J., & Valencia, A. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00851 · Cited by 281
A neural network multi-task learning approach to biomedical named entity recognition
Crichton, G., Pyysalo, S., Chiu, B., & Korhonen, A. (2017) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1776-8 · Cited by 229
PKDE4J: Entity and relation extraction for public knowledge discovery
Song, M., Kim, W. C., Lee, D., Heo, G. E., & Kang, K. Y. (2015) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.08.008 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Bada, M., Eckert, M., Evans, D., Garcia, K., Shipley, K., Sitnikov, D., Baumgartner, W. A., Cohen, K. B., Verspoor, K., Blake, J. A., & Hunter, L. E.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2012-07-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 161-161
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040298461
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 8.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concept annotation in the CRAFT corpus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-13-161
- The paper
- Bada, M., Eckert, M., Evans, D., Garcia, K., Shipley, K., Sitnikov, D., Baumgartner, W. A., Cohen, K. B., Verspoor, K., Blake, J. A., & Hunter, L. E. (2012). Concept annotation in the CRAFT corpus. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-161
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.