Cited by 490Algorithms and Data CompressionGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFractal and DNA sequence analysis

Reducing storage requirements for biological sequence comparison

Open access
Roberts, Michael, Hayes, Wayne, Hunt, Brian R., Mount, Stephen M., Yorke, James A.·2004·Bioinformatics

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Comparison of nucleic acid and protein sequences is a fundamental tool of modern bioinformatics. A dominant method of such string matching is the 'seed-and-extend' approach, in which occurrences of short subsequences called 'seeds' are used to search for potentially longer matches in a large database of sequences. Each such potential match is then checked to see if it extends beyond the seed. To be effective, the seed-and-extend approach needs to catalogue seeds from virtually every substring in the database of search strings. Projects such as mammalian genome assemblies and large-scale protein matching, however, have such large sequence databases that the resulting list of seeds cannot be stored in RAM on a single computer. This significantly slows the matching process. RESULTS: We present a simple and elegant method in which only a small fraction of seeds, called 'minimizers', needs to be stored. Using minimizers can speed up string-matching computations by a large factor while missing only a small fraction of the matches found using all seeds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth408

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, M., Hayes, W., Hunt, B. R., Mount, S. M., & Yorke, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Roberts, Michael
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2004-07-15
Volume
20
Issue
18
Pages
3363-3369
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2144560237
Cited by
485
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0312360, 0104087, 0114792)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (1R01HG0294501)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
Keywords
minimizers, string matching, sequence comparison, storage reduction, nucleic acid sequences, protein sequences, sequence databases
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Information Storage and Retrieval, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Analysis, Databases, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review