Cited by 70Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesGene Regulatory Network Analysis

HyBrow: a prototype system for computer-aided hypothesis evaluation

Racunas, S. A., Shah, N. H., Albert, I., Fedoroff, N. V.·2004·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Experimental design, hypothesis-testing and model-building in the current data-rich environment require the biologists' to collect, evaluate and integrate large amounts of information of many disparate kinds. Developing a unified framework for the representation and conceptual integration of biological data and processes is a major challenge in bioinformatics because of the variety of available data and the different levels of detail at which biological processes can be considered. Results: We have developed the HyBrow (Hypothesis Browser) system as a prototype bioinformatics tool for designing hypotheses and evaluating them for consistency with existing knowledge. HyBrow consists of a modeling framework with the ability to accommodate diverse biological information sources, an event-based ontology for representing biological processes at different levels of detail, a database to query information in the ontology and programs to perform hypothesis design and evaluation. We demonstrate the HyBrow prototype using the galactose gene network in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as our test system, and evaluate alternative hypotheses for consistency with stored information. Availability: www.hybrow.org

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth905

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A common, inclusive and computable pathway data language is necessary to share knowledge about pathway maps and facilitate integration and use for hypothesis testing in biology.

    “A common, inclusive and computable pathway data language is necessary to share knowledge about pathway maps and to facilitate integration and use for hypothesis testing in biology24.”

    From The BioPAX community standard for pathway data sharing (2010) · cites this paper as [24]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The BioPAX community standard for pathway data sharing

    Demir, E., Cary, M. P., Paley, S., Fukuda, K., Lemer, C., Vastrik, I., Wu, G., D'Eustachio, P., Schaefer, C., Luciano, J., et al. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1666 · Cited by 745 · see citing works

    “For instance, visualization and analysis tools developed for one pathway database cannot be reused for others, making software development efforts more expensive.”
    Self-citation

Authors
Racunas, S. A., Shah, N. H., Albert, I., & Fedoroff, N. V.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Racunas, S. A.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2004-08-04
Volume
20
Issue
suppl_1
Pages
i257-i264
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2120702690
Cited by
70
References
30
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
hypothesis evaluation, biological process modeling, biological data integration, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, bioinformatics software
MeSH terms
Galactose, Models, Biological, Pilot Projects, Research Design, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Information Storage and Retrieval, Systems Integration, Computational Biology, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review