The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automatic Quality Assessment of Peptide Tandem Mass Spectra
Abstract
Motivation: A powerful proteomics methodology couples high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with tandem mass spectrometry and database-search software, such as SEQUEST. Such a set-up, however, produces a large number of spectra, many of which are of too poor quality to be useful. Hence a filter that eliminates poor spectra before the database search can significantly improve throughput and robustness. Moreover, spectra judged to be of high quality, but that cannot be identified by database search, are prime candidates for still more computationally intensive methods, such as de novo sequencing or wider database searches including post-translational modifications. Results: We report on two different approaches to assessing spectral quality prior to identification: binary classification, which predicts whether or not SEQUEST will be able to make an identification, and statistical regression, which predicts a more universal quality metric involving the number of b- and y-ion peaks. The best of our binary classifiers can eliminate over 75% of the unidentifiable spectra while losing only 10% of the identifiable spectra. Statistical regression can pick out spectra of modified peptides that can be identified by a de novo program but not by SEQUEST. In a section of independent interest, we discuss intensity normalization of mass spectra.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
Cited by
Kuo, J.-C., Han, X., Hsiao, C.-T., Yates III, J. R., & Waterman, C. M. (2011) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2216 · Cited by 591
Recapitulation of premature ageing with iPSCs from Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome
Liu, G.-H., Barkho, B. Z., Ruiz, S., Diep, D., Qu, J., Yang, S.-L., Panopoulos, A. D., Suzuki, K., Kurian, L., Walsh, C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09879 · Cited by 575
Self-citationSadygov, R. G., Cociorva, D., & Yates, J. R. (2004) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth725 · Cited by 408
Self-citationOptimization of Mass Spectrometry-Compatible Surfactants for Shotgun Proteomics
Chen, E. I., Cociorva, D., Norris, J. L., & Yates, J. R. (2007) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr060682a · Cited by 218
Self-citationProteomics Analysis Unravels the Functional Repertoire of Coronavirus Nonstructural Protein 3
Neuman, B. W., Joseph, J. S., Saikatendu, K. S., Serrano, P., Chatterjee, A., Johnson, M. A., Liao, L., Klaus, J. P., Yates, J. R., Wüthrich, K., et al. (2008) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.02631-07 · Cited by 192
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bern, M., Goldberg, D., McDonald, W. H., & Yates, J. R.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-08-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- suppl_1
- Pages
- i49-i54
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2135337307
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic Quality Assessment of Peptide Tandem Mass Spectra. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth947
- The paper
- Bern, M., Goldberg, D., McDonald, W. H., & Yates, J. R. (2004). Automatic Quality Assessment of Peptide Tandem Mass Spectra. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth947
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.