The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PSORTb v.2.0: Expanded prediction of bacterial protein subcellular localization and insights gained from comparative proteome analysis
Abstract
Motivation: PSORTb v.1.1 is the most precise bacterial localization prediction tool available. However, the program's predictive coverage and recall are low and the method is only applicable to Gram-negative bacteria. The goals of the present work are as follows: increase PSORTb's coverage while maintaining the existing precision level, expand it to include Gram-positive bacteria and then carry out a comparative analysis of localization. Results: An expanded database of proteins of known localization and new modules using frequent subsequence-based support vector machines was introduced into PSORTb v.2.0. The program attains a precision of 96% for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and predictive coverage comparable to other tools for whole proteome analysis. We show that the proportion of proteins at each localization is remarkably consistent across species, even in species with varying proteome size. Availability: Web-based version: http://www.psort.org/psortb. Standalone version: Available through the website under GNU General Public License. Contact: psort-mail@sfu.ca, brinkman@sfu.ca Supplementary information: http://www.psort.org/psortb/supplementaryinfo.html
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Cited by
A protocol for generating a high-quality genome-scale metabolic reconstruction
Thiele, I., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2010) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2009.203 · Cited by 1,789
NetB, a New Toxin That Is Associated with Avian Necrotic Enteritis Caused by Clostridium perfringens
Keyburn, A. L., Boyce, J. D., Vaz, P., Bannam, T. L., Ford, M. E., Parker, D., Di Rubbo, A., Rood, J. I., & Moore, R. J. (2008) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.0040026 · Cited by 624
Proteomics in gram‐negative bacterial outer membrane vesicles
Lee, E., Choi, D., Kim, K., & Gho, Y. S. (2008) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20175 · Cited by 339
Assembling the Marine Metagenome, One Cell at a Time
Woyke, T., Xie, G., Copeland, A., González, J. M., Han, C., Kiss, H., Saw, J. H., Senin, P., Yang, C., Chatterji, S., et al. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005299 · Cited by 332
Moriel, D. G., Bertoldi, I., Spagnuolo, A., Marchi, S., Rosini, R., Nesta, B., Pastorello, I., Corea, V. A. M., Torricelli, G., Cartocci, E., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0915077107 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Gardy, J. L., Laird, M. R., Chen, F., Rey, S., Walsh, C. J., Ester, M., & Brinkman, F. S. L.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-10-22
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 617-623
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2154202919
- Cited by
- 718
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PSORTb v.2.0: Expanded prediction of bacterial protein subcellular localization and insights gained from comparative proteome analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti057
- The paper
- Gardy, J. L., Laird, M. R., Chen, F., Rey, S., Walsh, C. J., Ester, M., & Brinkman, F. S. L. (2005). PSORTb v.2.0: Expanded prediction of bacterial protein subcellular localization and insights gained from comparative proteome analysis. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti057
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
