Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 718

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PILER: identification and classification of genomic repeats

Edgar, R. C., Myers, E. W.·2005·Bioinformatics

Abstract

SUMMARY: Repeated elements such as satellites and transposons are ubiquitous in eukaryotic genomes. De novo computational identification and classification of such elements is a challenging problem. Therefore, repeat annotation of sequenced genomes has historically largely relied on sequence similarity to hand-curated libraries of known repeat families. We present a new approach to de novo repeat annotation that exploits characteristic patterns of local alignments induced by certain classes of repeats. We describe PILER, a package of efficient search algorithms for identifying such patterns. Novel repeats found using PILER are reported for Homo sapiens, Arabidopsis thalania and Drosophila melanogaster. AVAILABILITY: The PILER software is freely available at http://www.drive5.com/piler.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1003

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 718

Metadata

Authors
Edgar, R. C., & Myers, E. W.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2005-06-01
Volume
21
Issue
Suppl 1
Pages
i152-i158
ISSN
  • 0266-7061 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4803
  • 1460-2059
OpenAlex
W2122954888
Cited by
718
References
13
FWCI
18.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PILER: identification and classification of genomic repeats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1003
The paper
Edgar, R. C., & Myers, E. W. (2005). PILER: identification and classification of genomic repeats. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.