Cited by 20Machine Learning in BioinformaticsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksProtein Structure and Dynamics

Predicting post-synaptic activity in proteins with data mining

Pappa, Gisele L., Baines, Anthony J., Freitas, Alex A.·2005·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Summary: The bioinformatics problem being addressed in this paper is to predict whether or not a protein has post-synaptic activity. This problem is of great intrinsic interest because proteins with post-synaptic activities are connected with functioning of the nervous system. Indeed, many proteins having post-synaptic activity have been functionally characterized by biochemical, immunological and proteomic exercises. They represent a wide variety of proteins with functions in extracellular signal reception and propagation through intracellular apparatuses, cell adhesion molecules and scaffolding proteins that link them in a web. The challenge is to automatically discover features of the primary sequences of proteins that typically occur in proteins with post-synaptic activity but rarely (or never) occur in proteins without post-synaptic activity, and vice-versa. In this context, we used data mining to automatically discover classification rules that predict whether or not a protein has post-synaptic activity. The discovered rules were analysed with respect to their predictive accuracy (generalization ability) and with respect to their interestingness to biologists (in the sense of representing novel, unexpected knowledge). Contact: A.A.Freitas@kent.ac.uk

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1102

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models

    Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F., Giannotti, F., & Pedreschi, D. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3236009 · Cited by 629 · see citing works

    “Even though this sort of exception analysis is hardly performed, it can be more informative than the direct explanation, and it can also provide clues about the application domain [37, 85].”
    Background

Authors
Pappa, G. L., Baines, A. J., & Freitas, A. A.
Affiliations
University of Kent (GB)
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2005-09-01
Volume
21
Issue
suppl_2
Pages
ii19-ii25
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2123497007
Cited by
20
References
17
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
postsynaptic proteins, protein function prediction, classification rules, adhesion molecules, scaffold proteins, rule interestingness
MeSH terms
Database Management Systems, Nerve Endings, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Structure-Activity Relationship, Synapses, Information Storage and Retrieval, Neurotransmitter Agents, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review