The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regularized ROC method for disease classification and biomarker selection with microarray data
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: An important application of microarrays is to discover genomic biomarkers, among tens of thousands of genes assayed, for disease classification. Thus there is a need for developing statistical methods that can efficiently use such high-throughput genomic data, select biomarkers with discriminant power and construct classification rules. The ROC (receiver operator characteristic) technique has been widely used in disease classification with low-dimensional biomarkers because (1) it does not assume a parametric form of the class probability as required for example in the logistic regression method; (2) it accommodates case–control designs and (3) it allows treating false positives and false negatives differently. However, due to computational difficulties, the ROC-based classification has not been used with microarray data. Moreover, the standard ROC technique does not incorporate built-in biomarker selection. Results: We propose a novel method for biomarker selection and classification using the ROC technique for microarray data. The proposed method uses a sigmoid approximation to the area under the ROC curve as the objective function for classification and the threshold gradient descent regularization method for estimation and biomarker selection. Tuning parameter selection based on the V-fold cross validation and predictive performance evaluation are also investigated. The proposed approach is demonstrated with a simulation study, the Colon data and the Estrogen data. The proposed approach yields parsimonious models with excellent classification performance. Availability: R code is available upon request. Contact: jian@stat.uiowa.edu
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spline Models for Observational Data
Wahba, G. (1990) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970128 · Cited by 4,184
Cited by
Plasma phospholipids identify antecedent memory impairment in older adults
Mapstone, M., Cheema, A. K., Fiandaca, M. S., Zhong, X., Mhyre, T. R., MacArthur, L. H., Hall, W. J., Fisher, S. G., Peterson, D. R., Haley, J. M., et al. (2014) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3466 · Cited by 1,043
Regularized gene selection in cancer microarray meta-analysis
Ma, S., & Huang, J. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-1 · Cited by 831
Self-citationThe Evolution of Boosting Algorithms: From Machine Learning to Statistical Modelling
Binder, H., Gefeller, O., Schmid, M., & Mayr, A. (2014) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.3414/me13-01-0122 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, S., & Huang, J.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-10-18
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 4356-4362
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2154884142
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regularized ROC method for disease classification and biomarker selection with microarray data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti724
- The paper
- Ma, S., & Huang, J. (2005). Regularized ROC method for disease classification and biomarker selection with microarray data. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti724
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.