The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Regularized gene selection in cancer microarray meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In cancer studies, it is common that multiple microarray experiments are conducted to measure the same clinical outcome and expressions of the same set of genes. An important goal of such experiments is to identify a subset of genes that can potentially serve as predictive markers for cancer development and progression. Analyses of individual experiments may lead to unreliable gene selection results because of the small sample sizes. Meta analysis can be used to pool multiple experiments, increase statistical power, and achieve more reliable gene selection. The meta analysis of cancer microarray data is challenging because of the high dimensionality of gene expressions and the differences in experimental settings amongst different experiments. RESULTS: We propose a Meta Threshold Gradient Descent Regularization (MTGDR) approach for gene selection in the meta analysis of cancer microarray data. The MTGDR has many advantages over existing approaches. It allows different experiments to have different experimental settings. It can account for the joint effects of multiple genes on cancer, and it can select the same set of cancer-associated genes across multiple experiments. Simulation studies and analyses of multiple pancreatic and liver cancer experiments demonstrate the superior performance of the MTGDR. CONCLUSION: The MTGDR provides an effective way of analyzing multiple cancer microarray studies and selecting reliable cancer-associated genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Simulating 500 million years of evolution with a language model
Hayes, T., Rao, R., Akin, H., Sofroniew, N. J., Oktay, D., Lin, Z., Verkuil, R., Tran, V. Q., Deaton, J., Wiggert, M., et al. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ads0018 · Cited by 937
Stem-cell-derived human microglia transplanted in mouse brain to study human disease
Mancuso, R., Van Den Daele, J., Fattorelli, N., Wolfs, L., Balusu, S., Burton, O., Liston, A., Sierksma, A., Fourne, Y., Poovathingal, S., et al. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0525-x · Cited by 295
Identification of two pathways mediating protein targeting from ER to lipid droplets
Song, J., Mizrak, A., Lee, C.-W., Cicconet, M., Lai, Z. W., Tang, W.-C., Lu, C.-H., Mohr, S. E., Farese, R. V., & Walther, T. C. (2022) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-022-00974-0 · Cited by 106
Design of highly functional genome editors by modeling the universe of CRISPR-Cas sequences
Ruffolo, J. A., Nayfach, S., Gallagher, J., Bhatnagar, A., Beazer, J., Hussain, R., Russ, J., Yip, J., Hill, E., Pacesa, M., et al. (2024) · doi:10.1101/2024.04.22.590591 · Cited by 90
Unexpected complexity of the ammonia monooxygenase in archaea
(2023) · doi:10.1038/s41396-023-01367-3 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, S., & Huang, J.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2009-01-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050077513
- Cited by
- 831
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regularized gene selection in cancer microarray meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-10-1
- The paper
- Ma, S., & Huang, J. (2009). Regularized gene selection in cancer microarray meta-analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.