The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic comparison and evaluation of biclustering methods for gene expression data
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: In recent years, there have been various efforts to overcome the limitations of standard clustering approaches for the analysis of gene expression data by grouping genes and samples simultaneously. The underlying concept, which is often referred to as biclustering, allows to identify sets of genes sharing compatible expression patterns across subsets of samples, and its usefulness has been demonstrated for different organisms and datasets. Several biclustering methods have been proposed in the literature; however, it is not clear how the different techniques compare with each other with respect to the biological relevance of the clusters as well as with other characteristics such as robustness and sensitivity to noise. Accordingly, no guidelines concerning the choice of the biclustering method are currently available. Results: First, this paper provides a methodology for comparing and validating biclustering methods that includes a simple binary reference model. Although this model captures the essential features of most biclustering approaches, it is still simple enough to exactly determine all optimal groupings; to this end, we propose a fast divide-and-conquer algorithm (Bimax). Second, we evaluate the performance of five salient biclustering algorithms together with the reference model and a hierarchical clustering method on various synthetic and real datasets for Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Arabidopsis thaliana. The comparison reveals that (1) biclustering in general has advantages over a conventional hierarchical clustering approach, (2) there are considerable performance differences between the tested methods and (3) already the simple reference model delivers relevant patterns within all considered settings. Availability: The datasets used, the outcomes of the biclustering algorithms and the Bimax implementation for the reference model are available at Contact: bleuler@tik.ee.ethz.ch Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Algorithm AS 136: A K-Means Clustering Algorithm
Hartigan, J. A., & Wong, M. A. (1979) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2346830 · Cited by 14,523
Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms
Bezdek, J. C. (1981) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0450-1 · Cited by 9,881
(1975) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 5,958
Genomic Expression Programs in the Response of Yeast Cells to Environmental Changes
Gasch, A. P., Spellman, P. T., Kao, C. M., Carmel-Harel, O., Eisen, M. B., Storz, G., Botstein, D., & Brown, P. O. (2000) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.11.12.4241 · Cited by 4,815
A Statistical Method for Evaluating Systematic Relationships
Sokal, R. R., & Michener, C. D. (1958) · Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16435756 · Cited by 4,416
On Clustering Validation Techniques
Halkidi, M., Batistakis, Y., & Vazirgiannis, M. (2001) · Journal of Intelligent Information Systems · doi:10.1023/a:1012801612483 · Cited by 2,646
The Database of Interacting Proteins: 2004 update
Salwinski, L. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh086 · Cited by 2,271
Biclustering of expression data.
Cheng, Y., & Church, G. M. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 2,098
Biclustering algorithms for biological data analysis: a survey
Madeira, S. C., & Oliveira, A. L. (2004) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2004.2 · Cited by 2,049
Cited by
Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing
Navin, N., Kendall, J., Troge, J., Andrews, P., Rodgers, L., McIndoo, J., Cook, K., Stepansky, A., Levy, D., Esposito, D., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09807 · Cited by 2,598
Genevestigator V3: A Reference Expression Database for the Meta‐Analysis of Transcriptomes
Hruz, T., Laule, O., Szabo, G., Wessendorp, F., Bleuler, S., Oertle, L., Widmayer, P., Gruissem, W., & Zimmermann, P. (2008) · Advances in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1155/2008/420747 · Cited by 1,910
Self-citationCSI: A Hybrid Deep Model for Fake News Detection
Ruchansky, N., Seo, S., & Liu, Y. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3132847.3132877 · Cited by 1,039
A Review of Feature Selection and Feature Extraction Methods Applied on Microarray Data
Hira, Z. M., & Gillies, D. F. (2015) · Advances in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1155/2015/198363 · Cited by 936
Integrative approaches for finding modular structure in biological networks
Mitra, K., Carvunis, A.-R., Ramesh, S. K., & Ideker, T. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3552 · Cited by 535
Metadata
- Authors
- Prelić, A., Bleuler, S., Zimmermann, P., Wille, A., Bühlmann, P., Gruissem, W., Hennig, L., Thiele, L., & Zitzler, E.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-02-24
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1122-1129
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2105883975
- Cited by
- 910
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 18.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic comparison and evaluation of biclustering methods for gene expression data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl060
- The paper
- Prelić, A., Bleuler, S., Zimmermann, P., Wille, A., Bühlmann, P., Gruissem, W., Hennig, L., Thiele, L., & Zitzler, E. (2006). A systematic comparison and evaluation of biclustering methods for gene expression data. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.