Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 572

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploiting indirect neighbours and topological weight to predict protein function from protein–protein interactions

Chua, Hon Nian, Sung, Wing-Kin, Wong, Limsoon·2006·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Most approaches in predicting protein function from protein–protein interaction data utilize the observation that a protein often share functions with proteins that interacts with it (its level-1 neighbours). However, proteins that interact with the same proteins (i.e. level-2 neighbours) may also have a greater likelihood of sharing similar physical or biochemical characteristics. We speculate that functional similarity between a protein and its neighbours from the two different levels arise from two distinct forms of functional association, and a protein is likely to share functions with its level-1 and/or level-2 neighbours. We are interested in finding out how significant is functional association between level-2 neighbours and how they can be exploited for protein function prediction. Results: We made a statistical study on recent interaction data and observed that functional association between level-2 neighbours is clearly observable. A substantial number of proteins are observed to share functions with level-2 neighbours but not with level-1 neighbours. We develop an algorithm that predicts the functions of a protein in two steps: (1) assign a weight to each of its level-1 and level-2 neighbours by estimating its functional similarity with the protein using the local topology of the interaction network as well as the reliability of experimental sources and (2) scoring each function based on its weighted frequency in these neighbours. Using leave-one-out cross validation, we compare the performance of our method against that of several other existing approaches and show that our method performs relatively well. Contact: g0306417@nus.edu.sg

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl145

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 572

Metadata

Authors
Chua, H. N., Sung, W.-K., & Wong, L.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2006-04-21
Volume
22
Issue
13
Pages
1623-1630
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2107710781
Cited by
572
References
17
FWCI
11.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploiting indirect neighbours and topological weight to predict protein function from protein–protein interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl145
The paper
Chua, H. N., Sung, W.-K., & Wong, L. (2006). Exploiting indirect neighbours and topological weight to predict protein function from protein–protein interactions. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl145

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.