The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detecting functional modules in the yeast protein–protein interaction network
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Identification of functional modules in protein interaction networks is a first step in understanding the organization and dynamics of cell functions. To ensure that the identified modules are biologically meaningful, network-partitioning algorithms should take into account not only topological features but also functional relationships, and identified modules should be rigorously validated. Results: In this study we first integrate proteomics and microarray datasets and represent the yeast protein–protein interaction network as a weighted graph. We then extend a betweenness-based partition algorithm, and use it to identify 266 functional modules in the yeast proteome network. For validation we show that the functional modules are indeed densely connected subgraphs. In addition, genes in the same functional module confer a similar phenotype. Furthermore, known protein complexes are largely contained in the functional modules in their entirety. We also analyze an example of a functional module and show that functional modules can be useful for gene annotation. Contact: yuan.33@osu.edu Supplementary Information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization
Barabási, A.-L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1272 · Cited by 7,903
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
From molecular to modular cell biology.
Hartwell, L. H., Hopfield, J. J., Leibler, S., & Murray, A. W. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35011540 · Cited by 3,632
A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome
Ito, T., Chiba, T., Ozawa, R., Yoshida, M., Hattori, M., & Sakaki, Y. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.061034498 · Cited by 3,566
Defining and identifying communities in networks
Radicchi, F., Castellano, C., Cecconi, F., Loreto, V., & Parisi, D. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0400054101 · Cited by 2,450
Cited by
Fortunato, S. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002 · Cited by 11,293
Network‐based classification of breast cancer metastasis
Chuang, H., Lee, E., Liu, Y., Lee, D., & Ideker, T. (2007) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb4100180 · Cited by 1,431
Inferring Pathway Activity toward Precise Disease Classification
Lee, E., Chuang, H.-Y., Kim, J.-W., Ideker, T., & Lee, D. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000217 · Cited by 600
Community Detection and Stochastic Block Models
Abbe, E. (2018) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781680834772 · Cited by 544
Community detection in social networks
Bedi, P., & Sharma, C. (2016) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1178 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, J., & Yuan, B.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-07-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2283-2290
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2100628741
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting functional modules in the yeast protein–protein interaction network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl370
- The paper
- Chen, J., & Yuan, B. (2006). Detecting functional modules in the yeast protein–protein interaction network. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl370
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.