The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: The numbers of finished and ongoing genome projects are increasing at a rapid rate, and providing the catalog of genes for these new genomes is a key challenge. Obtaining a set of well-characterized genes is a basic requirement in the initial steps of any genome annotation process. An accurate set of genes is needed in order to learn about species-specific properties, to train gene-finding programs, and to validate automatic predictions. Unfortunately, many new genome projects lack comprehensive experimental data to derive a reliable initial set of genes. Results: In this study, we report a computational method, CEGMA (Core Eukaryotic Genes Mapping Approach), for building a highly reliable set of gene annotations in the absence of experimental data. We define a set of conserved protein families that occur in a wide range of eukaryotes, and present a mapping procedure that accurately identifies their exon–intron structures in a novel genomic sequence. CEGMA includes the use of profile-hidden Markov models to ensure the reliability of the gene structures. Our procedure allows one to build an initial set of reliable gene annotations in potentially any eukaryotic genome, even those in draft stages. Availability: Software and data sets are available online at http://korflab.ucdavis.edu/Datasets. Contact: ifkorf@ucdavis.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
The Draft Genome of Ciona intestinalis : Insights into Chordate and Vertebrate Origins
Dehal, P., Satou, Y., Campbell, R. K., Chapman, J., Degnan, B., De Tomaso, A., Davidson, B., Di Gregorio, A., Gelpke, M., Goodstein, D. M., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1080049 · Cited by 1,641
The Ensembl Automatic Gene Annotation System
Curwen, V., Eyras, E., Andrews, T. D., Clarke, L., Mongin, E., Searle, S. M. J., & Clamp, M. (2004) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1858004 · Cited by 400
Cited by
BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs
Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V., & Zdobnov, E. M. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 · Cited by 13,344
Manni, M., Berkeley, M. R., Seppey, M., Simão, F. A., & Zdobnov, E. M. (2021) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msab199 · Cited by 6,187
BUSCO applications from quality assessments to gene prediction and phylogenomics
Waterhouse, R. M., Seppey, M., Simão, F. A., Manni, M., Ioannidis, P., Klioutchnikov, G., Kriventseva, E. V., & Zdobnov, E. M. (2018) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msx319 · Cited by 2,214
Holt, C., & Yandell, M. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-491 · Cited by 2,118
Draft genome sequence of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), an orphan legume crop of resource-poor farmers
Varshney, R. K., Chen, W., Li, Y., Bharti, A. K., Saxena, R. K., Schlueter, J. A., Donoghue, M. T. A., Azam, S., Fan, G., Whaley, A. M., et al. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2022 · Cited by 874
Metadata
- Authors
- Parra, G., Bradnam, K., & Korf, I.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-03-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1061-1067
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2101786683
- Cited by
- 2,184
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm071
- The paper
- Parra, G., Bradnam, K., & Korf, I. (2007). CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm071
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.