Cited by 13,344Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesChromosomal and Genetic VariationsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs

Open access
Simão, Felipe A., Waterhouse, Robert M., Ioannidis, Panagiotis, Kriventseva, Evgenia V., Zdobnov, Evgeny M.·2015·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Genomics has revolutionized biological research, but quality assessment of the resulting assembled sequences is complicated and remains mostly limited to technical measures like N50. Results: We propose a measure for quantitative assessment of genome assembly and annotation completeness based on evolutionarily informed expectations of gene content. We implemented the assessment procedure in open-source software, with sets of Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs, named BUSCO. Availability and implementation: Software implemented in Python and datasets available for download from http://busco.ezlab.org. Contact: evgeny.zdobnov@unige.ch Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V., & Zdobnov, E. M.
Affiliations
University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Zdobnov, Evgeny M.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2015-06-09
Volume
31
Issue
19
Pages
3210-3212
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2155628349
Cited by
13,344
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1151 · 2025: 1488 · 2024: 1837 · 2023: 1766 · 2022: 1477 · 2021: 1780 · 2020: 1437 · 2019: 1017 · 2018: 751 · 2017: 462 · 2016: 143 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 4
FWCI
199.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (143936)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
genome completeness, single-copy orthologs, benchmarking, gene content, BUSCO, evolutionarily conserved genes, genome quality assessment
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Software, Genome, Gene Dosage, Computational Biology, Genomics, Molecular Sequence Annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review