The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Clustering of individuals into populations on the basis of multilocus genotypes is informative in a variety of settings. In population-genetic clustering algorithms, such as BAPS, STRUCTURE and TESS, individual multilocus genotypes are partitioned over a set of clusters, often using unsupervised approaches that involve stochastic simulation. As a result, replicate cluster analyses of the same data may produce several distinct solutions for estimated cluster membership coefficients, even though the same initial conditions were used. Major differences among clustering solutions have two main sources: (1) ‘label switching’ of clusters across replicates, caused by the arbitrary way in which clusters in an unsupervised analysis are labeled, and (2) ‘genuine multimodality,’ truly distinct solutions across replicates. Results: To facilitate the interpretation of population-genetic clustering results, we describe three algorithms for aligning multiple replicate analyses of the same data set. We have implemented these algorithms in the computer program CLUMPP (CLUster Matching and Permutation Program). We illustrate the use of CLUMPP by aligning the cluster membership coefficients from 100 replicate cluster analyses of 600 chickens from 20 different breeds. Availability: CLUMPP is freely available at http://rosenberglab.bioinformatics.med.umich.edu/clumpp.html Contact: mjakob@umich.edu
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Cited by
Jombart, T., Devillard, S., & Balloux, F. (2010) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/1471-2156-11-94 · Cited by 4,963
Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans
Lazaridis, I., Patterson, N., Mittnik, A., Renaud, G., Mallick, S., Kirsanow, K., Sudmant, P. H., Schraiber, J. G., Castellano, S., Lipson, M., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13673 · Cited by 1,357
Genotype, haplotype and copy-number variation in worldwide human populations
Jakobsson, M., Scholz, S. W., Scheet, P., Gibbs, J. R., VanLiere, J. M., Fung, H.-C., Szpiech, Z. A., Degnan, J. H., Wang, K., Guerreiro, R., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06742 · Cited by 714
Self-citationGenomic evidence for the Pleistocene and recent population history of Native Americans
Raghavan, M., Steinrücken, M., Harris, K., Schiffels, S., Rasmussen, S., DeGiorgio, M., Albrechtsen, A., Valdiosera, C., Ávila-Arcos, M. C., Malaspinas, A.-S., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab3884 · Cited by 540
Self-citationOrigins and Genetic Legacy of Neolithic Farmers and Hunter-Gatherers in Europe
Skoglund, P., Malmström, H., Raghavan, M., Storå, J., Hall, P., Willerslev, E., Gilbert, M. T. P., Götherström, A., & Jakobsson, M. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1216304 · Cited by 521
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jakobsson, M., & Rosenberg, N. A.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-05-07
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1801-1806
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2125092464
- Cited by
- 6,290
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm233
- The paper
- Jakobsson, M., & Rosenberg, N. A. (2007). CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm233
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.