The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting survival from microarray data—a comparative study
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Survival prediction from gene expression data and other high-dimensional genomic data has been subject to much research during the last years. These kinds of data are associated with the methodological problem of having many more gene expression values than individuals. In addition, the responses are censored survival times. Most of the proposed methods handle this by using Cox's proportional hazards model and obtain parameter estimates by some dimension reduction or parameter shrinkage estimation technique. Using three well-known microarray gene expression data sets, we compare the prediction performance of seven such methods: univariate selection, forward stepwise selection, principal components regression (PCR), supervised principal components regression, partial least squares regression (PLS), ridge regression and the lasso. Results: Statistical learning from subsets should be repeated several times in order to get a fair comparison between methods. Methods using coefficient shrinkage or linear combinations of the gene expression values have much better performance than the simple variable selection methods. For our data sets, ridge regression has the overall best performance. Availability: Matlab and R code for the prediction methods are available at http://www.med.uio.no/imb/stat/bmms/software/microsurv/. Contact: hegembo@math.uio.no
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction
John Lu, Z. Q. (2010) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2010.00646_6.x · Cited by 12,390
Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems
Hoerl, A. E., & Kennard, R. W. (1970) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634 · Cited by 9,648
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
van 't Veer, L. J., Dai, H., van de Vijver, M. J., He, Y. D., Hart, A. A. M., Mao, M., Peterse, H. L., van der Kooy, K., Marton, M. J., Witteveen, A. T., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415530a · Cited by 9,536
A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast Cancer
van de Vijver, M. J., He, Y. D., van 't Veer, L. J., Dai, H., Hart, A. A. M., Voskuil, D. W., Schreiber, G. J., Peterse, J. L., Roberts, C., Marton, M. J., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa021967 · Cited by 6,488
Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets
Sørlie, T., Tibshirani, R., Parker, J., Hastie, T., Marron, J. S., Nobel, A., Deng, S., Johnsen, H., Pesich, R., Geisler, S., et al. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0932692100 · Cited by 5,429
Rosenwald, A., Wright, G., Chan, W. C., Connors, J. M., Campo, E., Fisher, R. I., Gascoyne, R. D., Muller-Hermelink, H. K., Smeland, E. B., Giltnane, J. M., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa012914 · Cited by 3,829
Survival Analysis, Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data
Rao, M. B. (1998) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1998.10485206 · Cited by 3,617
Cited by
Geeleher, P., Cox, N. J., & Huang, R. S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r47 · Cited by 890
L1Penalized Estimation in the Cox Proportional Hazards Model
Goeman, J. J. (2010) · Biometrical Journal · doi:10.1002/bimj.200900028 · Cited by 816
Principles and methods of integrative genomic analyses in cancer
Kristensen, V. N., Lingjærde, O. C., Russnes, H. G., Vollan, H. K. M., Frigessi, A., & Børresen-Dale, A.-L. (2014) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3721 · Cited by 371
Self-citationWSISA: Making Survival Prediction from Whole Slide Histopathological Images
Zhu, X., Yao, J., Zhu, F., & Huang, J. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.725 · Cited by 292
Spooner, A., Chen, E., Sowmya, A., Sachdev, P., Kochan, N. A., Trollor, J., & Brodaty, H. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-77220-w · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Bøvelstad, H. M., Nygård, S., Størvold, H. L., Aldrin, M., Borgan, Ø., Frigessi, A., & Lingjærde, O. C.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-06-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2080-2087
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2012339972
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting survival from microarray data—a comparative study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm305
- The paper
- Bøvelstad, H. M., Nygård, S., Størvold, H. L., Aldrin, M., Borgan, Ø., Frigessi, A., & Lingjærde, O. C. (2007). Predicting survival from microarray data—a comparative study. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
