The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graph-based consensus clustering for class discovery from gene expression data
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Consensus clustering, also known as cluster ensemble, is one of the important techniques for microarray data analysis, and is particularly useful for class discovery from microarray data. Compared with traditional clustering algorithms, consensus clustering approaches have the ability to integrate multiple partitions from different cluster solutions to improve the robustness, stability, scalability and parallelization of the clustering algorithms. By consensus clustering, one can discover the underlying classes of the samples in gene expression data. Results: In addition to exploring a graph-based consensus clustering (GCC) algorithm to estimate the underlying classes of the samples in microarray data, we also design a new validation index to determine the number of classes in microarray data. To our knowledge, this is the first time in which GCC is applied to class discovery for microarray data. Given a pre specified maximum number of classes (denoted as Kmax in this article), our algorithm can discover the true number of classes for the samples in microarray data according to a new cluster validation index called the Modified Rand Index. Experiments on gene expression data indicate that our new algorithm can (i) outperform most of the existing algorithms, (ii) identify the number of classes correctly in real cancer datasets, and (iii) discover the classes of samples with biological meaning. Availability: Matlab source code for the GCC algorithm is available upon request from Zhiwen Yu. Contact: yuzhiwen@cs.cityu.edu.hk and cshswong@cityu.edu.hk Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Khan, J., Wei, J. S., Ringnér, M., Saal, L. H., Ladanyi, M., Westermann, F., Berthold, F., Schwab, M., Antonescu, C. R., Peterson, C., et al. (2001) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/89044 · Cited by 2,644
Monti, S., Tamayo, P., Mesirov, J., & Golub, T. (2003) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1023949509487 · Cited by 2,116
Cited by
Dong, X., Yu, Z., Cao, W., Shi, Y., & Ma, Q. (2020) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-019-8208-z · Cited by 1,928
Self-citationInformation theoretic measures for clusterings comparison: is a correction for chance necessary?
Vinh, N. X., Epps, J., & Bailey, J. (2009) · Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1553374.1553511 · Cited by 938
Wei, L., Xing, P., Zeng, J., Chen, J., Su, R., & Guo, F. (2017) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2017.03.001 · Cited by 242
BETZEL, R. F., GRIFFA, A., AVENA-KOENIGSBERGER, A., GOÑI, J., THIRAN, J.-P., HAGMANN, P., & SPORNS, O. (2013) · Network Science · doi:10.1017/nws.2013.19 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, Z., Wong, H.-S., & Wang, H.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-09-14
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 2888-2896
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2122644269
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graph-based consensus clustering for class discovery from gene expression data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm463
- The paper
- Yu, Z., Wong, H.-S., & Wang, H. (2007). Graph-based consensus clustering for class discovery from gene expression data. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm463
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.