The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of drug–target interaction networks from the integration of chemical and genomic spaces
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: The identification of interactions between drugs and target proteins is a key area in genomic drug discovery. Therefore, there is a strong incentive to develop new methods capable of detecting these potential drug–target interactions efficiently. Results: In this article, we characterize four classes of drug–target interaction networks in humans involving enzymes, ion channels, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and nuclear receptors, and reveal significant correlations between drug structure similarity, target sequence similarity and the drug–target interaction network topology. We then develop new statistical methods to predict unknown drug–target interaction networks from chemical structure and genomic sequence information simultaneously on a large scale. The originality of the proposed method lies in the formalization of the drug–target interaction inference as a supervised learning problem for a bipartite graph, the lack of need for 3D structure information of the target proteins, and in the integration of chemical and genomic spaces into a unified space that we call ‘pharmacological space’. In the results, we demonstrate the usefulness of our proposed method for the prediction of the four classes of drug–target interaction networks. Our comprehensively predicted drug–target interaction networks enable us to suggest many potential drug–target interactions and to increase research productivity toward genomic drug discovery. Availability: Softwares are available upon request. Contact: Yoshihiro.Yamanishi@ensmp.fr Supplementary information: Datasets and all prediction results are available at http://web.kuicr.kyoto-u.ac.jp/supp/yoshi/drugtarget/.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SuperTarget and Matador: resources for exploring drug-target relationships
Gunther, S., Kuhn, M., Dunkel, M., Campillos, M., Senger, C., Petsalaki, E., Ahmed, J., Urdiales, E. G., Gewiess, A., Jensen, L. J., et al. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm862 · Cited by 647
Cited by
Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery
Hopkins, A. L. (2008) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.118 · Cited by 4,622
A Review on Applications of Computational Methods in Drug Screening and Design
Lin, X., Li, X., & Lin, X. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25061375 · Cited by 718
Tsubaki, M., Tomii, K., & Sese, J. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty535 · Cited by 688
Drug–target interaction prediction: databases, web servers and computational models
Chen, X., Yan, C. C., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., Dai, F., Yin, J., & Zhang, Y. (2016) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbv066 · Cited by 658
Chen, L., Tan, X., Wang, D., Zhong, F., Liu, X., Yang, T., Luo, X., Chen, K., Jiang, H., & Zheng, M. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa524 · Cited by 607
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamanishi, Y., Araki, M., Gutteridge, A., Honda, W., & Kanehisa, M.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-07-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- i232-i240
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2153838454
- Cited by
- 1,147
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of drug–target interaction networks from the integration of chemical and genomic spaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn162
- The paper
- Yamanishi, Y., Araki, M., Gutteridge, A., Honda, W., & Kanehisa, M. (2008). Prediction of drug–target interaction networks from the integration of chemical and genomic spaces. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn162
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.