Cited by 370Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Identifying novel constrained elements by exploiting biased substitution patterns

Open access
Garber, Manuel, Guttman, Mitchell, Clamp, Michele, Zody, Michael C., Friedman, Nir, Xie, Xiaohui·2009·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Comparing the genomes from closely related species provides a powerful tool to identify functional elements in a reference genome. Many methods have been developed to identify conserved sequences across species; however, existing methods only model conservation as a decrease in the rate of mutation and have ignored selection acting on the pattern of mutations. Results: We present a new approach that takes advantage of deeply sequenced clades to identify evolutionary selection by uncovering not only signatures of rate-based conservation but also substitution patterns characteristic of sequence undergoing natural selection. We describe a new statistical method for modeling biased nucleotide substitutions, a learning algorithm for inferring site-specific substitution biases directly from sequence alignments and a hidden Markov model for detecting constrained elements characterized by biased substitutions. We show that the new approach can identify significantly more degenerate constrained sequences than rate-based methods. Applying it to the ENCODE regions, we identify as much as 10.2% of these regions are under selection. Availability: The algorithms are implemented in a Java software package, called SiPhy, freely available at http://www.broadinstitute.org/science/software/. Contact: xhx@ics.uci.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp190

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Comparative genomics analyses (species-tree inference, comparative annotation, selection detection) require genome alignments.

    “Comparative genomics analyses, including species-tree inference7,8, comparative annotation9,10, and selection detection11,12, require genome alignments.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Asthana S Analysis of sequence conservation at nucleotide resolution PLOS Comput. Biol. 2007 3 e254 18166073 PMC2230682
  2. Bejerano G A distal enhancer and an ultraconserved exon are derived from a novel retroposon Nature 2006 441 87 90 16625209
  3. Birney E Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the encode pilot project Nature 2007 447 799 816 17571346 PMC2212820
  4. Blanchette M Aligning multiple genomic sequences with the threaded blockset Aligner Genome Res. 2004 14 708 715 15060014 PMC383317
  5. Cooper GM Distribution and intensity of constraint in mammalian genomic sequence Genome Res. 2005 15 901 913 15965027 PMC1172034
  6. Diallo AB Exact and heuristic algorithms for the indel maximum likelihood problem J. Comput. Biol. 2007 14 446 461 17572023
  7. Durbin R Biological Sequence Analysis. 1998 New York Cambridge University Press
  8. Eddy SR A model of the statistical power of comparative genome sequence analysis PLoS Biol. 2005 3 e10 15660152 PMC539325
  9. Green P 2x genomes Does depth matter? Genome Res. 2007 17 1547 1549 17975171
  10. Halpern A Bruno W Evolutionary distances for protein-coding sequences: modeling site-specific residue frequencies Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998 15 910 917 9656490
  11. Holmes I Rubin GM An expectation maximization algorithm for training hidden substitution models J. Mol. Biol. 2002 317 753 764 11955022
  12. Kamal M A large family of ancient repeat elements in the human genome is under strong selection Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2006 103 2740 2745 16477033 PMC1413850
  13. Kent WJ The Human Genome Browser at UCSC Genome Res. 2002 12 996 1006 12045153 PMC186604
  14. Margulies E Birney E Approaches to comparative sequence analysis: towards a functional view of vertebrate genomes Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008 9 303 18347593
  15. Margulies E An initial strategy for the systematic identification of functional elements in the human genome by low-redundancy comparative sequencing Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2005 102 4795 4800 15778292 PMC555705
  16. Margulies EH Identification and characterization of multi-species conserved sequences Genome Res. 2003 13 2507 2518 14656959 PMC403793
  17. Margulies EH Analyses of deep mammalian sequence alignments and constraint predictions for 1% of the human genome Genome Res. 2007 17 760 774 17567995 PMC1891336
  18. Miller W 28-Way vertebrate alignment and conservation track in the UCSC Genome Browser Genome Res. 2007 17 1797 17984227 PMC2099589
  19. Pruitt KD NCBI Reference Sequence (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 33 D501 D504 15608248 PMC539979
  20. Rivas E Eddy SR Probabilistic phylogenetic inference with insertions and deletions PLoS Comput. Biol. 2008 4 e1000172 18787703 PMC2527138
  21. Snir S Pachter L Apostolico A Phylogenetic profiling of insertions and deletions in vertebrate genomes Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2006 3909 New York Springer 265 275 RECOMB
  22. Stark A Discovery of functional elements in 12 drosophila genomes using evolutionary signatures Nature 2007 450 219 232 17994088 PMC2474711

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garber, M., Guttman, M., Clamp, M., Zody, M. C., Friedman, N., & Xie, X.
Affiliations
Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Xie, Xiaohui
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2009-05-27
Volume
25
Issue
12
Pages
i54-i62
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2155845523
Cited by
370
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
National Human Genome Research Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
natural selection, sequence conservation, hidden Markov models, comparative genomics
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Base Sequence, Software, Sequence Alignment, Evolution, Molecular, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review