The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Skyline is a Windows client application for targeted proteomics method creation and quantitative data analysis. It is open source and freely available for academic and commercial use. The Skyline user interface simplifies the development of mass spectrometer methods and the analysis of data from targeted proteomics experiments performed using selected reaction monitoring (SRM). Skyline supports using and creating MS/MS spectral libraries from a wide variety of sources to choose SRM filters and verify results based on previously observed ion trap data. Skyline exports transition lists to and imports the native output files from Agilent, Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific and Waters triple quadrupole instruments, seamlessly connecting mass spectrometer output back to the experimental design document. The fast and compact Skyline file format is easily shared, even for experiments requiring many sample injections. A rich array of graphs displays results and provides powerful tools for inspecting data integrity as data are acquired, helping instrument operators to identify problems early. The Skyline dynamic report designer exports tabular data from the Skyline document model for in-depth analysis with common statistical tools. Availability: Single-click, self-updating web installation is available at http://proteome.gs.washington.edu/software/skyline. This web site also provides access to instructional videos, a support board, an issues list and a link to the source code project. Contact: brendanx@u.washington.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, the targeted MS quantification method based on selected reaction monitoring [132–134] was recently implemented to understanding the transmission of a plant virus.”
From Proteomic approaches to uncovering virus–host protein interactions during the progression of viral infection (2016) · cites this paper as [132]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ProteoWizard: open source software for rapid proteomics tools development
Kessner, D., Chambers, M., Burke, R., Agus, D., & Mallick, P. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn323 · Cited by 2,024
Self-citationAddona, T. A., Abbatiello, S. E., Schilling, B., Skates, S. J., Mani, D. R., Bunk, D. M., Spiegelman, C. H., Zimmerman, L. J., Ham, A.-J. L., Keshishian, H., et al. (2009) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1546 · Cited by 1,037
Self-citationDesiere, F. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj040 · Cited by 910
Purely Functional Data Structures
Okasaki, C. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511530104 · Cited by 635
Krokhin, O. V., Craig, R., Spicer, V., Ens, W., Standing, K. G., Beavis, R. C., & Wilkins, J. A. (2004) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m400031-mcp200 · Cited by 284
Analysis of Peptide MS/MS Spectra from Large-Scale Proteomics Experiments Using Spectrum Libraries
Frewen, B. E., Merrihew, G. E., Wu, C. C., Noble, W. S., & MacCoss, M. J. (2006) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac060279n · Cited by 249
Self-citationPrakash, A., Tomazela, D. M., Frewen, B., MacLean, B., Merrihew, G., Peterman, S., & MacCoss, M. J. (2009) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr801028b · Cited by 147
Self-citationMartin, D. B., Holzman, T., May, D., Peterson, A. C., Eastham, A., Eng, J. K., & McIntosh, M. W. (2008) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m700504-mcp200 · Cited by 86
Finney, G. L., Blackler, A. R., Hoopmann, M. R., Canterbury, J. D., Wu, C. C., & MacCoss, M. J. (2008) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac701649e · Cited by 61
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gillet, L. C., Navarro, P., Tate, S., Röst, H., Selevsek, N., Reiter, L., Bonner, R., & Aebersold, R. (2012) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.o111.016717 · Cited by 2,877
Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function
Aebersold, R., & Mann, M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19949 · Cited by 2,334
Checkpoint blockade cancer immunotherapy targets tumour-specific mutant antigens
Gubin, M. M., Zhang, X., Schuster, H., Caron, E., Ward, J. P., Noguchi, T., Ivanova, Y., Hundal, J., Arthur, C. D., Krebber, W.-J., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13988 · Cited by 1,974
Proteomic and Metabolomic Characterization of COVID-19 Patient Sera
Shen, B., Yi, X., Sun, Y., Bi, X., Du, J., Zhang, C., Quan, S., Zhang, F., Sun, R., Qian, L., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.032 · Cited by 1,514
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
Metadata
- Authors
- MacLean, B., Tomazela, D. M., Shulman, N., Chambers, M., Finney, G. L., Frewen, B., Kern, R., Tabb, D. L., Liebler, D. C., & MacCoss, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- MacLean, Brendan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-02-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 966-968
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- PMC
- PMC2844992
- OpenAlex
- W2141091417
- Cited by
- 4,697
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 248 · 2025: 308 · 2024: 400 · 2023: 391 · 2022: 386 · 2021: 436 · 2020: 465 · 2019: 390 · 2018: 324 · 2017: 326 · 2016: 301 · 2015: 236 · 2014: 192 · 2013: 131 · 2012: 94
- FWCI
- 42.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (P30AG013280)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL082747)
- National Cancer Institute (U24CA126479)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK069386)
- National Center for Research Resources (P41RR011823)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
- Keywords
- skyline, targeted proteomics, multiple reaction monitoring, open source software, dynamic report generation
- MeSH terms
- Software, Mass Spectrometry, User-Computer Interface, Databases, Protein, Proteomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
