The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MEME-ChIP: motif analysis of large DNA datasets
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Advances in high-throughput sequencing have resulted in rapid growth in large, high-quality datasets including those arising from transcription factor (TF) ChIP-seq experiments. While there are many existing tools for discovering TF binding site motifs in such datasets, most web-based tools cannot directly process such large datasets. Results: The MEME-ChIP web service is designed to analyze ChIP-seq ‘peak regions’—short genomic regions surrounding declared ChIP-seq ‘peaks’. Given a set of genomic regions, it performs (i) ab initio motif discovery, (ii) motif enrichment analysis, (iii) motif visualization, (iv) binding affinity analysis and (v) motif identification. It runs two complementary motif discovery algorithms on the input data—MEME and DREME—and uses the motifs they discover in subsequent visualization, binding affinity and identification steps. MEME-ChIP also performs motif enrichment analysis using the AME algorithm, which can detect very low levels of enrichment of binding sites for TFs with known DNA-binding motifs. Importantly, unlike with the MEME web service, there is no restriction on the size or number of uploaded sequences, allowing very large ChIP-seq datasets to be analyzed. The analyses performed by MEME-ChIP provide the user with a varied view of the binding and regulatory activity of the ChIP-ed TF, as well as the possible involvement of other DNA-binding TFs. Availability: MEME-ChIP is available as part of the MEME Suite at http://meme.nbcr.net. Contact: t.bailey@uq.edu.au Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning
Alipanahi, B., Delong, A., Weirauch, M. T., & Frey, B. J. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3300 · Cited by 2,873
A Validated Regulatory Network for Th17 Cell Specification
Ciofani, M., Madar, A., Galan, C., Sellars, M., Mace, K., Pauli, F., Agarwal, A., Huang, W., Parkurst, C. N., Muratet, M., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.016 · Cited by 1,160
iRegulon: From a Gene List to a Gene Regulatory Network Using Large Motif and Track Collections
Janky, R., Verfaillie, A., Imrichová, H., Van de Sande, B., Standaert, L., Christiaens, V., Hulselmans, G., Herten, K., Naval Sanchez, M., Potier, D., et al. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003731 · Cited by 900
Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells
Wu, X., Scott, D. A., Kriz, A. J., Chiu, A. C., Hsu, P. D., Dadon, D. B., Cheng, A. W., Trevino, A. E., Konermann, S., Chen, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2889 · Cited by 944
G-quadruplex structures mark human regulatory chromatin
Hänsel-Hertsch, R., Beraldi, D., Lensing, S. V., Marsico, G., Zyner, K., Parry, A., Di Antonio, M., Pike, J., Kimura, H., Narita, M., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3662 · Cited by 964
Metadata
- Authors
- Machanick, P., & Bailey, T. L.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-04-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1696-1697
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2157952888
- Cited by
- 1,806
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MEME-ChIP: motif analysis of large DNA datasets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr189
- The paper
- Machanick, P., & Bailey, T. L. (2011). MEME-ChIP: motif analysis of large DNA datasets. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr189
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.