Cited by 964DNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromosomal and Genetic Variations

G-quadruplex structures mark human regulatory chromatin

Open access
Hänsel-Hertsch, Robert, Beraldi, Dario, Lensing, Stefanie V, Marsico, Giovanni, Zyner, Katherine, Parry, Aled, Di Antonio, Marco, Pike, Jeremy +4 more·2016·Nature Genetics

Abstract

G-quadruplex (G4) structural motifs have been linked to transcription, replication and genome instability and are implicated in cancer and other diseases. However, it is crucial to demonstrate the bona fide formation of G4 structures within an endogenous chromatin context. Herein we address this through the development of G4 ChIP-seq, an antibody-based G4 chromatin immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing approach. We find ∼10,000 G4 structures in human chromatin, predominantly in regulatory, nucleosome-depleted regions. G4 structures are enriched in the promoters and 5' UTRs of highly transcribed genes, particularly in genes related to cancer and in somatic copy number amplifications, such as MYC. Strikingly, de novo and enhanced G4 formation are associated with increased transcriptional activity, as shown by HDAC inhibitor-induced chromatin relaxation and observed in immortalized as compared to normal cellular states. Our findings show that regulatory, nucleosome-depleted chromatin and elevated transcription shape the endogenous human G4 DNA landscape.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.3662

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence of G4s is significantly increased in immortalized cells compared to primary human cells.

    “Furthermore, the prevalence of G4s was found to be significantly increased in immortalized cells as compared to primary human cells (13).”

    From G-quadruplex-mediated genomic instability drives SNVs in cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [13]

    The comparison on p. 5 reports 10,560 G4 ChIP-seq peaks in immortalized HaCaT cells versus 1,496 in normal human epidermal keratinocytes; the Figure 3 caption calls the increase significant. The source supports this specific cell-type comparison, but not a general increase across immortalized cells compared with primary human cells. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hänsel-Hertsch, R., Beraldi, D., Lensing, S. V., Marsico, G., Zyner, K., Parry, A., Di Antonio, M., Pike, J., Kimura, H., Narita, M., Tannahill, D., & Balasubramanian, S.
Affiliations
  • Cancer Research UK (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Balasubramanian, Shankar
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2016-09-12
Volume
48
Issue
10
Pages
1267-1272
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2520749639
Cited by
964
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 98 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 135 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 3
FWCI
37.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Tokyo Tech Research Repository (Tokyo Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (099232/Z/12/Z)
  • Cancer Research UK (CB4330, 19836, C14303 / A17197, 18618, 15890)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
chromatin, nucleosome-depleted regions, promoter, 5' untranslated region, transcriptional regulation, chromatin immunoprecipitation, histone deacetylase inhibitors, chromatin relaxation, c-Myc, cancer genes, transcriptional activity
MeSH terms
Cell Line, Chromatin, Humans, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Transcription, Genetic, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, G-Quadruplexes, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review