Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 336

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM)

Open access
Grant, Gregory R., Farkas, Michael H., Pizarro, Angel D., Lahens, Nicholas F., Schug, Jonathan, Brunk, Brian P., Stoeckert, Christian J., Hogenesch, John B., Pierce, Eric A.·2011·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: A critical task in high-throughput sequencing is aligning millions of short reads to a reference genome. Alignment is especially complicated for RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) because of RNA splicing. A number of RNA-Seq algorithms are available, and claim to align reads with high accuracy and efficiency while detecting splice junctions. RNA-Seq data are discrete in nature; therefore, with reasonable gene models and comparative metrics RNA-Seq data can be simulated to sufficient accuracy to enable meaningful benchmarking of alignment algorithms. The exercise to rigorously compare all viable published RNA-Seq algorithms has not been performed previously. Results: We developed an RNA-Seq simulator that models the main impediments to RNA alignment, including alternative splicing, insertions, deletions, substitutions, sequencing errors and intron signal. We used this simulator to measure the accuracy and robustness of available algorithms at the base and junction levels. Additionally, we used reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) and Sanger sequencing to validate the ability of the algorithms to detect novel transcript features such as novel exons and alternative splicing in RNA-Seq data from mouse retina. A pipeline based on BLAT was developed to explore the performance of established tools for this problem, and to compare it to the recently developed methods. This pipeline, the RNA-Seq Unified Mapper (RUM), performs comparably to the best current aligners and provides an advantageous combination of accuracy, speed and usability. Availability: The RUM pipeline is distributed via the Amazon Cloud and for computing clusters using the Sun Grid Engine (http://cbil.upenn.edu/RUM). Contact: ggrant@pcbi.upenn.edu; epierce@mail.med.upenn.edu Supplementary Information:The RNA-Seq sequence reads described in the article are deposited at GEO, accession GSE26248.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr427

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 336

Metadata

Authors
Grant, G. R., Farkas, M. H., Pizarro, A. D., Lahens, N. F., Schug, J., Brunk, B. P., Stoeckert, C. J., Hogenesch, J. B., & Pierce, E. A.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2011-07-19
Volume
27
Issue
18
Pages
2518-2528
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2096173343
Cited by
336
References
8
FWCI
11.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr427
The paper
Grant, G. R., Farkas, M. H., Pizarro, A. D., Lahens, N. F., Schug, J., Brunk, B. P., Stoeckert, C. J., Hogenesch, J. B., & Pierce, E. A. (2011). Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM). Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr427

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.