The DOI matches its Crossref record.
TANGO: a generic tool for high-throughput 3D image analysis for studying nuclear organization
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: The cell nucleus is a highly organized cellular organelle that contains the genetic material. The study of nuclear architecture has become an important field of cellular biology. Extracting quantitative data from 3D fluorescence imaging helps understand the functions of different nuclear compartments. However, such approaches are limited by the requirement for processing and analyzing large sets of images. Results: Here, we describe Tools for Analysis of Nuclear Genome Organization (TANGO), an image analysis tool dedicated to the study of nuclear architecture. TANGO is a coherent framework allowing biologists to perform the complete analysis process of 3D fluorescence images by combining two environments: ImageJ (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) for image processing and quantitative analysis and R (http://cran.r-project.org) for statistical processing of measurement results. It includes an intuitive user interface providing the means to precisely build a segmentation procedure and set-up analyses, without possessing programming skills. TANGO is a versatile tool able to process large sets of images, allowing quantitative study of nuclear organization. Availability: TANGO is composed of two programs: (i) an ImageJ plug-in and (ii) a package (rtango) for R. They are both free and open source, available (http://biophysique.mnhn.fr/tango) for Linux, Microsoft Windows and Macintosh OSX. Distribution is under the GPL v.2 licence. Contact: thomas.boudier@snv.jussieu.fr Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A competitive inhibitory circuit for selection of active and passive fear responses
Fadok, J. P., Krabbe, S., Markovic, M., Courtin, J., Xu, C., Massi, L., Botta, P., Bylund, K., Müller, C., Kovacevic, A., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21047 · Cited by 473
SNT: a unifying toolbox for quantification of neuronal anatomy
Arshadi, C., Günther, U., Eddison, M., Harrington, K. I. S., & Ferreira, T. A. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01105-7 · Cited by 470
Chaudhry, A., Shi, R., & Luciani, D. S. (2020) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00457.2019 · Cited by 423
PRC1 catalytic activity is central to polycomb system function
Blackledge, N. P., Fursova, N. A., Kelley, J. R., Huseyin, M. K., Feldmann, A., & Klose, R. J. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.12.001 · Cited by 243
Spatiotemporal regulation of liquid-like condensates in epigenetic inheritance
Wan, G., Fields, B. D., Spracklin, G., Shukla, A., Phillips, C. M., & Kennedy, S. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0132-0 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Ollion, J., Cochennec, J., Loll, F., Escudé, C., & Boudier, T.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-05-16
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1840-1841
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2116529502
- Cited by
- 867
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TANGO: a generic tool for high-throughput 3D image analysis for studying nuclear organization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt276
- The paper
- Ollion, J., Cochennec, J., Loll, F., Escudé, C., & Boudier, T. (2013). TANGO: a generic tool for high-throughput 3D image analysis for studying nuclear organization. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt276
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.