Cited by 21Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference

Probabilistic PCA of censored data: accounting for uncertainties in the visualization of high-throughput single-cell qPCR data

Open access
Buettner, Florian, Moignard, Victoria, Göttgens, Berthold, Theis, Fabian J.·2014·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: High-throughput single-cell quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is a promising technique allowing for new insights in complex cellular processes. However, the PCR reaction can be detected only up to a certain detection limit, whereas failed reactions could be due to low or absent expression, and the true expression level is unknown. Because this censoring can occur for high proportions of the data, it is one of the main challenges when dealing with single-cell qPCR data. Principal component analysis (PCA) is an important tool for visualizing the structure of high-dimensional data as well as for identifying subpopulations of cells. However, to date it is not clear how to perform a PCA of censored data. We present a probabilistic approach that accounts for the censoring and evaluate it for two typical datasets containing single-cell qPCR data. Results: We use the Gaussian process latent variable model framework to account for censoring by introducing an appropriate noise model and allowing a different kernel for each dimension. We evaluate this new approach for two typical qPCR datasets (of mouse embryonic stem cells and blood stem/progenitor cells, respectively) by performing linear and non-linear probabilistic PCA. Taking the censoring into account results in a 2D representation of the data, which better reflects its known structure: in both datasets, our new approach results in a better separation of known cell types and is able to reveal subpopulations in one dataset that could not be resolved using standard PCA. Availability and implementation: The implementation was based on the existing Gaussian process latent variable model toolbox ( https://github.com/SheffieldML/GPmat ); extensions for noise models and kernels accounting for censoring are available at http://icb.helmholtz-muenchen.de/censgplvm . Contact: fbuettner.phys@gmail.com Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu134

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some facets of cellular identity are transient in time and space, and temporal processes may progress along trajectories, oscillate, or be influenced by spatial position.

    “First, in contexts such as development and physiology, some facets of cellular identity are transient in time and space. Temporal processes may, for example, progress along one or more trajectories (e.g., differentiation); oscillate continuously between cellular states (e.g., the cell cycle98,99 or circadian rhythm100); or be influenced by the physical position and neighborhood of the cell71,93.”
  • The number of required landmarks is related to spatial complexity, introducing the notion of power to detect spatial patterns.

    “The number of required landmarks is related to this spatial complexity, introducing the notion of power to detect spatial patterns93.”
  • Canonical structure is likely in most normal tissues (e.g., brain structures) and physiological processes (e.g., embryogenesis).

    “While this is a likely situation in most normal tissues (e.g., brain structures71) and physiological processes (e.g., embryogenesis93)”
  • Seurat and a method by Achim et al. combine limited spatial cues for landmark genes with scRNA-seq from dissociated tissue to infer the spatial location of dissociated cells.

    “This has inspired the development of two methods, Seurat (A.R. and colleagues)93 and a method by Achim et al.71 that combine limited spatial cues for landmark genes with single-cell RNA-seq of cells from the same type of dissociated tissue to infer the spatial location of the dissociated cells through the patterns reflected by the landmark genes.”
  • Even without new experimental methods, computational techniques can help relate distinct data types across single cells, as was effectively shown for relating spatially resolved in situ hybridization data to scRNA-seq to derive a spatial mapping of cells to positions.

    “Even without new experimental methods, computational techniques can help relate distinct data types across single cells, as was effectively shown for relating spatially resolved in situ hybridization data to scRNA-seq to derive a spatial mapping of cells to positions71,93.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lawrence N Winkler J Extensions of the informative vector machine Deterministic and Statistical Methods in Machine Learning, Volume 3635 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2005 Berlin, Heidelberg Springer 56 87

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buettner, F., Moignard, V., Göttgens, B., & Theis, F. J.
Affiliations
Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Buettner, Florian
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2014-03-10
Volume
30
Issue
13
Pages
1867-1875
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2146462627
Cited by
21
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (12765)
  • Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research
  • National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (G0900729/1)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Medical Research Council (MC_PC_12009)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/I00050X/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
probabilistic PCA, censored data, single-cell qPCR, Gaussian process latent variable model, detection limit, noise models, kernel selection, high-dimensional data visualization, cell subpopulations, mouse embryonic stem cells
MeSH terms
Animals, Probability, Software, Stem Cells, Principal Component Analysis, Mice, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review