Cited by 246Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsProtein Structure and DynamicsGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

A statistical approach for inferring the 3D structure of the genome

Open access
Varoquaux, Nelle, Ay, Ferhat, Noble, William Stafford, Vert, Jean-Philippe·2014·Bioinformatics

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Recent technological advances allow the measurement, in a single Hi-C experiment, of the frequencies of physical contacts among pairs of genomic loci at a genome-wide scale. The next challenge is to infer, from the resulting DNA-DNA contact maps, accurate 3D models of how chromosomes fold and fit into the nucleus. Many existing inference methods rely on multidimensional scaling (MDS), in which the pairwise distances of the inferred model are optimized to resemble pairwise distances derived directly from the contact counts. These approaches, however, often optimize a heuristic objective function and require strong assumptions about the biophysics of DNA to transform interaction frequencies to spatial distance, and thereby may lead to incorrect structure reconstruction. METHODS: We propose a novel approach to infer a consensus 3D structure of a genome from Hi-C data. The method incorporates a statistical model of the contact counts, assuming that the counts between two loci follow a Poisson distribution whose intensity decreases with the physical distances between the loci. The method can automatically adjust the transfer function relating the spatial distance to the Poisson intensity and infer a genome structure that best explains the observed data. RESULTS: We compare two variants of our Poisson method, with or without optimization of the transfer function, to four different MDS-based algorithms-two metric MDS methods using different stress functions, a non-metric version of MDS and ChromSDE, a recently described, advanced MDS method-on a wide range of simulated datasets. We demonstrate that the Poisson models reconstruct better structures than all MDS-based methods, particularly at low coverage and high resolution, and we highlight the importance of optimizing the transfer function. On publicly available Hi-C data from mouse embryonic stem cells, we show that the Poisson methods lead to more reproducible structures than MDS-based methods when we use data generated using different restriction enzymes, and when we reconstruct structures at different resolutions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A Python implementation of the proposed method is available at http://cbio.ensmp.fr/pastis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu268

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hi-C networks can be used to reconstruct the 3D structure of chromatin and its spatial distribution within the nucleus.

    “Similar to how atomic or amino-acid distances are used in determination of protein structure, HiC networks can be used to reconstruct the 3D structure of chromatin and its spatial distribution within the nucleus (Varoquaux et al., 2014).”

    From Mapping the multiscale structure of biological systems (2021) · cites this paper as Varoquaux et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varoquaux, N., Ay, F., Noble, W. S., & Vert, J.-P.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Noble, William Stafford
  • Vert, Jean-Philippe
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2014-06-11
Volume
30
Issue
12
Pages
i26-i33
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2165780114
Cited by
246
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 5
FWCI
9.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (305626)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-BINF-0001)
  • National Institutes of Health (-0001, GM103533)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U41HG007000)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41GM103533)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI106775)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (280032)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
Hi-C contact maps, chromosome folding, transfer function optimization, multidimensional scaling, mouse embryonic stem cells, reproducibility
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Chromosomes, DNA, Models, Molecular, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Models, Statistical, Poisson Distribution, Genome, Genomics, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review