Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

TRAL: tandem repeat annotation library

Schaper, Elke, Korsunsky, Alexander, Pečerska, Jūlija, Messina, Antonio, Murri, Riccardo, Stockinger, Heinz, Zoller, Stefan, Xenarios, Ioannis, Anisimova, Maria·2015·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Currently, more than 40 sequence tandem repeat detectors are published, providing heterogeneous, partly complementary, partly conflicting results. Results: We present TRAL, a tandem repeat annotation library that allows running and parsing of various detection outputs, clustering of redundant or overlapping annotations, several statistical frameworks for filtering false positive annotations, and importantly a tandem repeat annotation and refinement module based on circular profile hidden Markov models (cpHMMs). Using TRAL, we evaluated the performance of a multi-step tandem repeat annotation workflow on 547 085 sequences in UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot. The researcher can use these results to predict run-times for specific datasets, and to choose annotation complexity accordingly. Availability and implementation: TRAL is an open-source Python 3 library and is available, together with documentation and tutorials via http://www.vital-it.ch/software/tral. Contact: elke.schaper@isb-sib.ch

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv306

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
Schaper, E., Korsunsky, A., Pečerska, J., Messina, A., Murri, R., Stockinger, H., Zoller, S., Xenarios, I., & Anisimova, M.
Affiliations
1 Vital-IT group, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Quartier Sorge, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland, 2SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Quartier Sorge, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland, 3Department of Computer Science, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland, 4Graz University of Technology, Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, 8010 Graz, Austria, 5Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland, 6Services and Support for Science IT, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland and 7Institute of Applied Simulations, School of Life Sciences und Facility Management, Zürich University of Applied Sciences, 8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2015-05-18
Volume
31
Issue
18
Pages
3051-3053
ISSN
  • 1367-4811
  • 1367-4803
Cited by
19
References
17
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TRAL: tandem repeat annotation library. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv306
The paper
Schaper, E., Korsunsky, A., Pečerska, J., Messina, A., Murri, R., Stockinger, H., Zoller, S., Xenarios, I., & Anisimova, M. (2015). TRAL: tandem repeat annotation library. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv306

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.