Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 750

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DSigDB: drug signatures database for gene set analysis

Open access
Yoo, Minjae, Shin, Jimin, Kim, Jihye, Ryall, Karen A., Lee, Kyubum, Lee, Sunwon, Jeon, Minji, Kang, Jaewoo, Tan, Aik Choon·2015·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Summary: We report the creation of Drug Signatures Database (DSigDB), a new gene set resource that relates drugs/compounds and their target genes, for gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). DSigDB currently holds 22 527 gene sets, consists of 17 389 unique compounds covering 19 531 genes. We also developed an online DSigDB resource that allows users to search, view and download drugs/compounds and gene sets. DSigDB gene sets provide seamless integration to GSEA software for linking gene expressions with drugs/compounds for drug repurposing and translational research. Availability and implementation: DSigDB is freely available for non-commercial use at http://tanlab.ucdenver.edu/DSigDB. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Contact: aikchoon.tan@ucdenver.edu

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv313

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Choi, 2012, BOSS: context-enhanced search for biomedical objects, BMC Med. Inform. Decis Mak., 12, S7, 10.1186/1472-6947-12-S1-S7 · DOI
  2. Coldren, 2006, Baseline gene expression predicts sensitivity to gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines, Mol. Cancer Res., 4, 521, 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-06-0095 · DOI
  3. Culhane, 2009, GeneSigDB—a curated database of gene expression signatures, Nucleic Acids Res., 38, D716, 10.1093/nar/gkp1015 · DOI
  4. Davis, 2013, A CTD-Pfizer collaboration: manual curation of 88,000 scientific articles text mined for drug-disease and drug-phenotype interactions, Database, 2013, bat080, 10.1093/database/bat080 · DOI
  5. Lamb, 2006, The Connectivity Map: using gene-expression signatures to connect small molecules, genes, and disease, Science, 313, 1929, 10.1126/science.1132939 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Qin, 2014, TTD: Therapeutic target database update 2014: a resource for targeted therapeutics, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D1118, 10.1093/nar/gkt1129 · DOI
  7. Yang, 2013, Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC): a resource for therapeutic biomarker discovery in cancer cells, Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D955, 10.1093/nar/gks1111 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 750

Metadata

Authors
Yoo, M., Shin, J., Kim, J., Ryall, K. A., Lee, K., Lee, S., Jeon, M., Kang, J., & Tan, A. C.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2015-05-19
Volume
31
Issue
18
Pages
3069-3071
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2142879323
Cited by
750
References
3
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DSigDB: drug signatures database for gene set analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv313
The paper
Yoo, M., Shin, J., Kim, J., Ryall, K. A., Lee, K., Lee, S., Jeon, M., Kang, J., & Tan, A. C. (2015). DSigDB: drug signatures database for gene set analysis. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv313

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.